To: NormsRevenge
"Keller said he might have been
more willing to compromise with Fitzgerald over Miller's testimony "if I had known the details of Judy's entanglement with Libby." "
How could Keller compromise with Fitzgerald? When asked before a Grand Jury you either tell the truth and all you know or you don't! What's to compromise?
22 posted on
10/22/2005 10:58:36 AM PDT by
malia
To: malia
Are they finally just going to come out of the closest and admit that SHE is the source of all of this nonsense? SHE is the only one who is lying to the grand jury???? That Fitzgerald is only really preparing ONE indictment - against MILLER???
Hey, I think I might qualify for a spot on the NYT Editorial Board with conjecture like this! Maybe they are looking for somebody new to make up news now that they are close to dumping Miller.
24 posted on
10/22/2005 11:02:14 AM PDT by
bpjam
(Now accepting liberal apologies.....)
To: malia
"What's to compromise?
I think he's implying he'd have been willing to sell out a Republican source such as Libby..... journalistic 'principle' is only sacred when hypocritical MSM types find it convenient, otherwise to hell with principle!!
26 posted on
10/22/2005 11:08:36 AM PDT by
Enchante
(Joe Wilson: I only have two wives I'm willing to admit to....)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson