[CSM]

It's not as if this child will be any safer in state custody. In addition, if a person is to dangerous to society to have a child, then that person should not be out of prison. Would it have been better if the mother in this story killed the baby via an abortion.

If you support this confiscation of children based on a risk, be prepared for the left to use this power to remove children based on the hate speech contained in the bible.

[wideawake]

It's not as if this child will be any safer in state custody.

?

One thing's for sure - the child has a 100% chance of being raised in the presence of a rapist if the state does not take custody.

If you support this confiscation of children based on a risk, be prepared for the left to use this power to remove children based on the hate speech contained in the bible.

Non sequitur. The parental rights are being terminated not because of the rapist in question's personal religious beliefs but because of his record as a convicted rapist.

[gamarob1]

If you support this confiscation of children based on a risk, be prepared for the left to use this power to remove children based on the hate speech contained in the bible.

BINGO

This is NOT good news. For one thing, this man deserves an opportunity to father HIS child. Secondly, what right does the government have to take children away in circumstances like this???