Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brownian Motion Under The Microscope (Einstein Nobel Prize Discovery Questioned)
Science News ^ | 2005-10-16

Posted on 10/17/2005 11:59:06 PM PDT by nickcarraway

Lausanne, Switzerland -- An international group of researchers from the EPFL (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne), the University of Texas at Austin and the European Molecular Biology Laboratory in Heidelberg, Germany have demonstrated that Brownian motion of a single particle behaves differently than Einstein postulated one century ago.

Their results, to be published online October 11 in Physical Review Letters, provide direct physical evidence that validates a corrected form of the standard theory describing Brownian motion. Their experiment tracked the Brownian fluctuations of a single particle at microsecond time scales and nanometer length scales, marking the first time that single micron-sized particles suspended in fluid have been measured with such high precision.

A hundred years ago, Einstein first quantified Brownian motion, showing that the irregular movement of particles suspended in a fluid was caused by the random thermal agitation of the molecules in the surrounding fluid.

Scientists have subsequently discovered that many fundamental processes in living cells are driven by Brownian motion. And because Brownian particles move randomly throughout their surroundings, they have great potential for use as probes at the nanoscale. Researchers can get detailed information about a particle's environment by analyzing its Brownian trajectory.

"It is hard to overemphasize the importance of thoroughly understanding Brownian motion as we continue to delve ever deeper into the world of the infinitesimally small, " comments EPFL's lead researcher Sylvia Jeney.

Researchers have known for some time that when a particle is much larger than the surrounding fluid molecules, it will not experience the completely random motion that Einstein predicted. As the particle gains momentum from colliding with surrounding particles, it will displace fluid in its immediate vicinity. This will alter the flow field, which will then act back on the particle due to fluid inertia. At this time scale the particle's own inertia will also come into play. But no direct experimental evidence at the single particle level was available to support and quantify these effects.

Using a technique called Photonic Force Microscopy, the research team has been able to provide this evidence. They constructed an optical trap for a single micron-sized particle and recorded its Brownian fluctuations at the microsecond time scale. "The new microscope allows us to measure the particle's position with extreme precision," notes University of Texas professor Ernst-Ludwig Florin, a member of the research group.

At this high resolution, they found that the time it takes for the particle to make the transition from ballistic motion to diffusive motion was longer than the classical theory predicted.

"This work ratchets our understanding of the phenomenon up a step, providing essential physical evidence for dynamical effects occurring at short time scales," says Jeney.

Their results validate the corrected form of the equation describing Brownian motion, and underline the fact that deviations from the standard theory become increasingly important at very small time scales.

As researchers develop sophisticated, high resolution experimentation techniques for probing the nanoworld, these dynamical details of Brownian motion will be increasingly important.

Dr. Jeney was awarded the SSOM prize at the August 2005 meeting of the Swiss Society for Optics and Microscopy for her work in photonic force microscopy, the technique used in this research.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Germany; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: einstein; physics

1 posted on 10/17/2005 11:59:06 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I thought Einstein received his Nobel award for describing the photo-electric effect.


2 posted on 10/18/2005 1:36:03 AM PDT by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy

Indeed he did -- the 1921 Nobel was awarded primarily for his work on the photo-electric effect, but also mentioned in the award is his work on special relativity and his work on formulating a kinetic theory of Brownian motion:

http://nobelprize.org/physics/laureates/1921/press.html

His seminal work on all three was published (in 5 separate papers) in 1905:

http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/18/1/2/1


3 posted on 10/18/2005 2:43:48 AM PDT by MassLengthTime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

ping


4 posted on 10/18/2005 3:09:55 AM PDT by Bellflower (A new day is Coming!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I couldn't find the "question" about Einstien's Nobel, as mentioned in the title. Could you help me find it?


5 posted on 10/18/2005 3:14:19 AM PDT by Glenn (What I've dared, I've willed; and what I've willed, I'll do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MassLengthTime

Thanks for the links.

I saw that his work on Brownian motion was (of course) mentioned in the presentation speech. The reason for the award was "for his services to Theoretical Physics, and especially for his discovery of the law of the photoelectric effect".

(You've got a very apt alias!)


6 posted on 10/18/2005 5:20:13 AM PDT by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Photonic Force Microscopy

I want one of those....

7 posted on 10/18/2005 5:54:41 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Photonic Force Microscopy
"I want one of those...."

You need to send in 4 boxtops from Captain Quark cereal with your order...

8 posted on 10/18/2005 10:00:05 AM PDT by talleyman (There is no shortage of dangerous idiots...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy

As a former physicist, I'd have to review the research. But, the implication of this research is that there appears to be another randomized factor either to heat or other process that's effecting the motion.


9 posted on 10/18/2005 11:09:05 AM PDT by playball0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson