Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SUSAN ESTRICH HAS BEEN CHALLENGED TO HAVE A CONVERSATION WITH RAPE VICTIM JUANITA BROADDRICK
dfu | 10-17-05 | dfu

Posted on 10/17/2005 9:51:54 PM PDT by doug from upland

Susan Estrich
Robert Kingsley Professor in Law and Professor of Law and Political Science
Phone: (213) 740-7578
E-mail address: sestrich@law.usc.edu

================================================================================

Original thread: ATTN JUANITA BROADDRICK -- Apparently Susan Estrich thinks you are a liar

Early this afternoon, I called Professor Susan Estrich and spoke with her secretary, leaving a message and my phone number. The message was that I heard the comments of Ms. Estrich on Sean Hannity last week regarding Juanita Broaddrick. I asked if Ms. Estrich would speak with Broaddrick if it could be arranged. She believed Bill Clinton's denial of her rape charge. As a fellow rape survivor, perhaps Ms. Estrich should hear Broaddrick's side.

As of late this evening, not surprisingly, there has been no return call. So, a short time ago, an email was sent. CC went to Sean Hannity.


Professor Estrich:

I left a message today and hope you will return the call or respond to this communication.

We had some good exchanges when you were on the air doing your weekend show in Los Angeles. You and I differed, but I thought you were reasonably fair.

Last week I heard you on Sean Hannity saying that you do no believe the charge by Juanita Broaddrick that Bill Clinton raped her because Bill told you he didn't do it. You had a conversation about it. Of course, although he would lie to his wife, his daughter, his cabinet, a grand jury, and while pointing his finger at the American people, he would never lie to you.

You didn't say it, but you essentially called Broaddrick a liar. Okay, here is the challenge. If I can arrange for you to speak with her, will you do it? Just two rape survivors having a conversation.

If you refuse to speak with her, it will speak volumes about you. Political agenda trumps everything. Please show that you really are better than Nina Burleigh.

Waiting to hear from you. Tick-tock, tick-tock.

...Doug from Upland

=======================================================================

If any of you want to reinforce the challenge, her phone and email is above. Estrich wants us to think she is fair. Hannity says they are friends, and he respects her. Let's see what she will do. Let's see what Hannity will do.

For those who don't know about Nina Burleigh, YOU WILL FIND THIS AMUSING.

Additional note -- I really angered her liberal listeners in Los Angeles. On two occasions, Susan did an hour with her callers speaking about -- "Why I hate Doug from Upland." I was honored.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: broaddrick; estrich; hillary; rapevictims; rapist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

1 posted on 10/17/2005 9:51:56 PM PDT by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Ping


2 posted on 10/17/2005 9:52:18 PM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Heard you on Dr. Levin's show last week. Keep up the good work.


3 posted on 10/17/2005 9:58:59 PM PDT by Eagles6 (Dig deeper, more ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Hate? I thought the tolerant libs do not use the word hate.


4 posted on 10/17/2005 9:58:59 PM PDT by Stayingawayfromthedarkside (The stink you smell are the liberals fuming after Ann speaks!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Wonder if she ever thanked the bent one.

NBurleigh@literati.net


5 posted on 10/17/2005 9:59:16 PM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Not proved -- it's a Scottish term of law. And what I really like about it, in this case, is that it's not a judgment that Broaddrick is lying and it's not a judgment that Clinton committed rape. It's a judgment that nothing has been proved.
6 posted on 10/17/2005 10:04:18 PM PDT by mumps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mumps
Sound judgment -- it's an American concept. I want Susan to make her judgment after hearing from both her rapist pal and from the victim.
7 posted on 10/17/2005 10:09:01 PM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: All

I guess we can make our own judgment as to whom we believe.

8 posted on 10/17/2005 10:10:14 PM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
I'm jealous.

Next message you send her could you ask her if she can hate me too?

9 posted on 10/17/2005 10:10:59 PM PDT by South40 (Amnesty for ILLEGALS is a slap in the face to the USBP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Maybe Susan should also speak with Eileen Wellstone and Kathleen Willey.


10 posted on 10/17/2005 10:12:10 PM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Let me get this straight. Your argument is that Susan Estrich is somehow obligated to speak to this woman because she happens to be a rape victim? That's an interesting logic. If that makes sense then you'd have to agree with this too:

1. Someone accuses President Bush of rape.
2. Sean Hannity, who also happens to be an rape victim and is acquainted with President Bush, says that he believes President Bush when he says he didn't commit the crime.
3. Regardless, Sean Hannity is obligated to meet with the person who accused President Bush of rape.

Does that make sense to you? Sure doesn't make sense to me.
11 posted on 10/17/2005 10:12:46 PM PDT by MarkSeattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland; All

Doug HONEY you nail Carol Channing to the wall LOL!


12 posted on 10/17/2005 10:12:46 PM PDT by SevenofNine ("Not everybody in, it, for truth, justice, and the American way,"= Det Lennie Briscoe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: South40

She didn't hate me. We actually had some good debates. Her liberal listeners hated me.


13 posted on 10/17/2005 10:13:08 PM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MarkSeattle
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

You take a shot at my logic? And then you create a scenario in which Sean Hannity is a rape victim? You win post of the day, newbie fool.

14 posted on 10/17/2005 10:16:15 PM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
"You win post of the day, newbie fool."

And what does our contestant win, Doug?

"A home version of our game, decal: I GOT THE ZOT!"
15 posted on 10/17/2005 10:18:14 PM PDT by decal (Mother Nature and Real Life are conservatives; the Progs have never figured this out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MarkSeattle

Mark...is it raining in Seattle?

I think you totally missed the point, which is Susan Estrich just wrote a book about Hillary and is trying to get Hillary into the Oval Office. In so doing, quelling any of Bill's bimbos is priority one for Susan and the rest of the left wing klan. The fact that Susan believes Bill is eye opener number one. Eye opener number two is that she would say so without ever hearing Juanita's version.

Her goal is to get Hillary to the Oval Office, not to hear the truth.


16 posted on 10/17/2005 10:19:51 PM PDT by SideoutFred (Save us from the Looney Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: decal; JohnHuang2

He wins two cents. He seems to like to add that to his posts. JohnHuang2 -- you've been plagiarized.


17 posted on 10/17/2005 10:23:09 PM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

In the newbie's defense: I don't get the point of this either???

Have you consulted with Broderick about this? Does she WANT to sit down and have a one on one conversation with Estrich???


18 posted on 10/17/2005 10:25:58 PM PDT by bonfire (dwindler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SideoutFred

Exactly. And I want to get in her face and challenge her on this. She is a rape survivor who is siding with the rapist of another rape survivor. She believes the rapist before hearing from the victim. You'd think Susan would have a little more empathy. Or, is it more Democrat phoniness?


19 posted on 10/17/2005 10:26:16 PM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bonfire
I suggested this on my radio show last week with Candice Jackson, author of THEIR LIVES. Jackson is joining Juanita and Kathleen at the Clinton Library on Oct. 26, Hillary's birthday. Jackson though there was a chance Juanita might do this. It was just a suggestion, and I'd like to hear Susan's answer if it could be arranged.

The point is to accomplish one of two things. Either drive a wedge between Clinton and Estrich when she comes to realize the truth, or show Estrich as just another Democrat hack. The suggestion is for a phone conversation, not a one on one meeting. If the latter could be arranged, that would be excellent.

20 posted on 10/17/2005 10:31:12 PM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson