Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NormsRevenge
Prop 76 is deceptive. Ask yourself why a big spender like Schwarzenegger would seek power to cut spending. The obvious answer is he wouldn't. Then why seek the legislation? Because the initiative authorizes billions more in borrowing which allows Schwarzenegger to continue to increase spending without the necessary tax revenue.

Prop 76 is bad legislation being deceptively marketed. Vote NO on 76. Force Schwarzenegger to bring spending in line with revenues. Do not allow Schwarzenegger to continue spending borrowed money. Force Schwarzenegger to proposed balanced budgets and/or veto legislatively approved budgets when they aren't. It's already the law ... or didn't you know?

8 posted on 10/16/2005 12:25:08 PM PDT by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Amerigomag; calcowgirl
The same old argument, wanting to maintain the untenable status quo of the mandated funding for schools, as a result of Prop. 98. Then how come that the Republicans are FOR it, including Tom McClintock, and the Democrats and the Unions are AGAINST it? I recommend people go to the links below and read it for themselves, who is for and against what.

=====

McClintock's recommendations for CA Propositions
Summary of Recommendations on the CA Propositions by various organizations and parties

9 posted on 10/16/2005 4:14:18 PM PDT by FairOpinion (CA Props: Vote for Reform: YES on 73-78, NO on 79 & 80, NO on Y)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson