Why is it when the Slimes and the Whitewashington Post report on Tom Delay or Karl Rove they look for all the information they can find establishing guilt while ignoring any exculpatory information, including the outrageous actions of the prosecutors or their single-minded and obsessive drive to throw anything that will stick at their targets?
But when it's Hillary Clinton, or nearly any other Democrat, the only thing that gets reported, if anything gets reported at all, is whatever seems exculpatory, including trashing the reputation of the accusers, and ignores all information pointing to guilt. If this story were about a top Republican, you can bet suddenly the media would be interested in reporting all the facts pointing to the guilt of the Republican in question and no mitigating factors, including the inapplicabilty of the laws such as is the case in the Rove and Delay matters, wouldn't be reported or considered relevent.
Sheesh, our media is no different than Pravda or Tass was in the USSR. And I can't imagine you'd get any more of a one party perspective from North Korea's television and print news media.
Where are the emails?
We need to stop bothering the Washington Post. They (the reporters, editors and owners) are most likely sitting in some conference room applauding some democratic victory somewhere.
In 1974 during the Watergate I read the Wash.Post eagerly ,daily while in the Army and working at the Pentagon.
Since then it has become a slanted biased rag that I wouldn't whip my butt with.