Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: calcowgirl
He was condemned for killing four people in 1981 and claims jailhouse informants fabricated testimony that he confessed to the murders.

The testimony of four jailbirds regarding a supposed confession (to them) while in prison is hellishly thin to hang somebody over.

There are three thing I'd have to have before I'd ever feel good about capital punishment anymore:

This case clearly doesn't pass muster on any of those conditions.

17 posted on 10/11/2005 4:55:03 PM PDT by tamalejoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: tamalejoe
The testimony of four jailbirds regarding a supposed confession (to them) while in prison is hellishly thin to hang somebody over.

If that was the sole basis for the prosecution argument for the death penalty then it's highly doubtful we'd be having this discussion.

29 posted on 10/11/2005 5:05:53 PM PDT by Horatio Gates (Ski Tibet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: tamalejoe
You're right. We should free Mumia while we're at it.

FREE MUMIA

Oh yeah, sarcasm off

31 posted on 10/11/2005 5:07:49 PM PDT by ChuckHam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: tamalejoe

He founded the Crips.

This is not a debate. Therefore, he is the founder of a domestic terrorist organization.

I'm pretty sure he's guilty too. There's other evidence out there.


47 posted on 10/11/2005 5:24:30 PM PDT by Skywalk (Transdimensional Jihad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: tamalejoe

1. If the Ninth Circus Court failed to overturn the conviction of a black man convicted by an all-white jury, it must be pretty solid. That's the most liberal court in the country.

2. "The present adversarial system of justice would have to be scrapped in favor of an inquisitorial system in which the common incentive for all parties involved would be to arrive at the truth and facts of the matter."

With yourself as Grand High Inquisitor, I suppose?
Will you please reread and think carefully about that statement?
Hey, it ain't perfect, but our system of justice is still the best in the world. As Ben Franklin said, "It is better that a hundred guilty men go free than that one innocent man be condemned." It is the adversarial system that ensures that the rights of the accused are protected.
When the defense attorney tries every dirty trick in the book to get their client off, goes after the credibility of the witnesses and the cops, questions the evidence, the testimony, everything- and the jury still convicts- that's when the system works.
This being said, we have to make sure defense counsel is competent, and that prosecutors follow the rules. When these do not occur, there is room for error.


52 posted on 10/11/2005 5:31:51 PM PDT by Ostlandr (Hey, Salada! I need a new Tagline!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: tamalejoe

"The criteria has to be beyond any doubt whatsoever. Beyond a "reasonable doubt" just doesn't cut it for capital punishment; you can't unhang somebody when you screw up. "

Taking away a person's freedom for any length of time is also irreversible. Would you apply the same standard to incarceration?

"The person has to represent a continuing threat to the public should he ever escape or otherwise get out. "

If there is a deterrent effect to capital punishment, not punishing the guilty party causes harm to society.


72 posted on 10/11/2005 6:28:30 PM PDT by Tymesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: tamalejoe

The problem with life sentences is that they aren't for life.


77 posted on 10/11/2005 7:08:27 PM PDT by badgerlandjim (Hillary Clinton is to politics as Helen Thomas is to beauty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: tamalejoe
Some of the evidence presented against Williams include:


78 posted on 10/11/2005 7:18:36 PM PDT by BraveMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: tamalejoe

Except for the one about 'no doubt whatsoever', I don't buy your conditions, however, despite having supported the death penalty for most of my life, I now object to it for several other reasons.
One, there have been too many (it doesn't take very many to be TOO many) people on death row found to be innocent when modern testing was used, and too many times, it was found that the cops were in a hurry to solve and crime and didn't care how they did it.
Two, it isn't sure enough or fast enough to be a deterrent. Potential criminals figure they aren't going to be caught, if they are, they won't be convicted, and if they are, they won't be sentenced to death, and if they are, it'll take 20+ years.


88 posted on 10/31/2005 3:59:19 PM PST by Imnotalib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: tamalejoe
The present adversarial system of justice would have to be scrapped in favor of an inquisitorial system in which the common incentive for all parties involved would be to arrive at the truth and facts of the matter.

And how long would that take?

25 years?

50 years?

100 years?

And in the meantime you'd stop executions?

Seesh, why can't you be more honest and dipense with the first two objections?

96 posted on 11/28/2005 8:26:05 PM PST by Balding_Eagle (God has blessed Republicans with really stupid enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: tamalejoe
While in prison, Tookie raped others and he went after prison guards with shivs.

Many times, in order to catch and convict criminals, you have to rely of testimony of some very unsavory characters.

If you demand that there must be 100%, completely undeniable proof for every crime, you aren't ever going to convict most people who commit crimes of any kind.

Are you sure that you're on the right forum for you ? That bleeding heart is making a mess on the floor.

101 posted on 11/29/2005 12:24:47 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson