Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Harriet Miers, Constitutionalist: Can We Ask for More?
The National Ledger ^ | October 10, 2005 | Lee Ellis

Posted on 10/10/2005 2:59:18 PM PDT by quidnunc

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-156 next last
To: Betaille

Ya know....YOU used to be a Democrat.....I'm sure we can't trust that YOU won't be SWAYED in the future to the Left, right?


41 posted on 10/10/2005 3:27:48 PM PDT by goodnesswins (DEMS....40 yrs and $$$dollars for the War on Poverty, but NOT a $$ or minute for the WAR on Terror!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ez
"So those with judicial track records...Souter, Kennedy, and O'Connor all swung left."

They certainly were not conservative. That is my point.
42 posted on 10/10/2005 3:28:30 PM PDT by Hendrix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

Do her credentials stand alone?

If she was not a friend of the Administration, would she have been selected?

If she had been picked by the Dems, would she be acceptable?


43 posted on 10/10/2005 3:29:10 PM PDT by airborne (Al-Queda can recruit on college campuses but the US military can't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Betaille

The original poster is one of those GOP is god kind of people..


44 posted on 10/10/2005 3:30:00 PM PDT by k2blader (Hic sunt dracones..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hendrix; Betaille

Betaille was a Democrat just 3 years ago.....he/she should be "disqualifed" from commenting as far as I'm concerned.../sarcasm


45 posted on 10/10/2005 3:30:11 PM PDT by goodnesswins (DEMS....40 yrs and $$$dollars for the War on Poverty, but NOT a $$ or minute for the WAR on Terror!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: marsh_of_mists
I'm going to; I'm planning to reserve judgement till after her hearings.

That's a reasonable position. I can respect that.

Also, I don't think all this conservative turmoil is worth it, when there were other(s),

So who is raising the turmoil? Armchair quarterbacks of all stripes.

46 posted on 10/10/2005 3:30:16 PM PDT by ez (W. quells 2 consecutive filibusters and gets 2 religious people on the court. Bravo!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: airborne

Excellent points.


47 posted on 10/10/2005 3:30:25 PM PDT by clintonh8r (If you don't support the mission, you DON'T "support the troops"!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

>>there is still an opportunity to put up controversial
>>conservatives for the Supreme Court and have the time to wage war against the Socialists in Congress.

If we are busy waging war against the Socialists, will we still have time to wage war against the Democrats?


48 posted on 10/10/2005 3:32:06 PM PDT by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: airborne
Do her credentials stand alone?

If she was not a friend of the Administration, would she have been selected?

I think her legal qualifications as a lawyer are good enough, but her history (she was a democrat just a few years ago) does not suggest that she is a conservative. We are told to just shut up and trust Bush on this one, much like what has happened in the past with republican SC nominees that turned out to go liberal.
49 posted on 10/10/2005 3:33:05 PM PDT by Hendrix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
look down their noses at anyone who does not graduate from Harvard or Yale or even Stanford.

I disagree. Most of us don't care if she graduated from Biff's College of Law and Auto Mechanics Institute. The fact is that she has no record as a conservative.

Seven of the nine justices on SCOTUS are Republican appointees. We (conservatives) have been burned too many times to blindly accept a nominee with a history of RAT campaign contributions and no proven conservative philosophy. Conservatives are willing to walk through hell for Janice Rogers Brown, Michael Luttig, Samuel Alito, Priscilla Owens, Emilio Garza, Miguel Estrada or Edith Clement. Instead, we get a former Lottery Commissioner.

50 posted on 10/10/2005 3:33:28 PM PDT by nonliberal (Graduate: Curtis E. LeMay School of International Relations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ez

"So who is raising the turmoil? Armchair quarterbacks of all stripes."

Yes, I wonder if he had known all the squabbling Miers would generate, would Bush have even nominated her. I think he would have gone with his 2nd choice.


51 posted on 10/10/2005 3:33:38 PM PDT by marsh_of_mists
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Hendrix
Hey, I was a DemocRat a few years ago does that mean I'm not a Conservative?? Guess Ronald Reagan wasn't a Conservative either. Please, who died and made you the Conservative god??

Pray for W and Harriet Miers

52 posted on 10/10/2005 3:34:30 PM PDT by bray (Islam IS a terrorist organization)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

"Miers once owned a .45-caliber revolver, a gift from a brother who was worried about her safety when she lived alone in Dallas."
She said, "The same liberties that ensure a free society make the innocent vulnerable to those who prevent rights and privileges and commit senseless and cruel acts," Miers wrote in Texas Lawyer when she was president of the state bar. "Those precious liberties include free speech, freedom to assemble ... access to public places, the right to bear arms and freedom from constant surveillance.

"We are not willing to sacrifice these rights because of the acts of maniacs," she concluded.


53 posted on 10/10/2005 3:34:59 PM PDT by FreeRep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: nonliberal

Exactly.


54 posted on 10/10/2005 3:35:03 PM PDT by Hendrix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: DakotaGator

Absolutely.


55 posted on 10/10/2005 3:36:12 PM PDT by A.Hun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: bray
"Hey, I was a DemocRat a few years ago does that mean I'm not a Conservative?? Guess Ronald Reagan wasn't a Conservative either. Please, who died and made you the Conservative god??"

I guess we can excuse your past ignorance, but I don't want to take a chance on a SC lifetime appointment to a former democrat without any real conservative track record. That is just plain stupid IMO. Reagan proved himself. She has not.
56 posted on 10/10/2005 3:38:49 PM PDT by Hendrix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: nonliberal
"Conservatives are willing to walk through hell for Janice Rogers Brown, Michael Luttig, Samuel Alito, Priscilla Owens, Emilio Garza, Miguel Estrada or Edith Clement. Instead, we get a former Lottery Commissioner."

yep. No self-respecting Christian would be associated in any way with the state lottery. Next we'll hear she waitressed at Hooters.
57 posted on 10/10/2005 3:39:16 PM PDT by Mulch (tm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: marsh_of_mists
But is she intellectually strong enough to resist the leftist pull of the media/Beltway cocktail set? Anthony Kennedy wasn't.

Having been connected to people the caliber of George Bush, Dick Cheney, or Condoleeza Rice-why would she ever consider demeaning herself with the "intelligentsia" of Washington, DC.

58 posted on 10/10/2005 3:39:49 PM PDT by A.Hun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #59 Removed by Moderator

To: nonliberal

How much of the background of those you listed do you know? I mean THEIR PERSONAL BACKGROUND. I'll bet the President has more information on them than you do, and that he nominated Miers because she can make it through the DEMOCRAT ANAL EXAM that will be given for every Republican nominee. Betcha! Those ALREADY on the bench somewhere, as those on your list are, have LOTS to lose if their backgrounds aren't CLEAN as a raindrop in the rainforest.


60 posted on 10/10/2005 3:40:47 PM PDT by goodnesswins (DEMS....40 yrs and $$$dollars for the War on Poverty, but NOT a $$ or minute for the WAR on Terror!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-156 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson