[Matchett-PI]

"...But according to you, that would ..."

Ahhhhhhh ... you were quoting Moorad Alexanian, Professor of Physics University of North Carolina at Wilmington and attributing them to me throughout. LOL

"Matchett-PI has already had his false statements corrected many times before, so he *knows* they're false when he makes them, but just in case people new to the topic might read his post and mistake his comments for some sort of gospel (*cough*), I think it's important to point out yet again where he is posting outright falsehoods..."

Are you going to attempt to debunk my theory on the evolution of makeup AGAIN??? Hahahaha

[Ichneumon]

["...But according to you, that would ..."]

Ahhhhhhh ... you were quoting Moorad Alexanian, Professor of Physics University of North Carolina at Wilmington and attributing them to me throughout. LOL

It's not my fault you so poorly formatted your post that it wasn't apparent that you were parroting someone else instead of writing your own words. The links at the end appeared to be citations for the final quotes.

Next time, try indenting the material or provide an introductory line if you want to make it obvious that it's not your own ramblings.

But I'm curious: are you trying to say that the material you chose to post *doesn't* contain views you actually agree with? And you're still responsible for their appearing here, and are responsible for any errors it contains. You don't get a pass just because you're using someone else as a "guest speaker" in your post, when you chose to post it.

Are you going to attempt to debunk my theory on the evolution of makeup AGAIN??? Hahahaha

No, since *that's* something I can agree with... (It is amazing what a difference it makes, isn't it?)

[Aracelis]

Are you going to attempt to debunk my theory on the evolution of makeup AGAIN??? Hahahaha

Here we do appear to have significant evidence, and can agree - particularly with your last offering.