Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ShadowDancer
Bork doesn't sit on the Supreme Court.

Bork could still exercise some restraint until he gets more information about Miers's views.

As could lots of folks on the right.

But I'm beginning to think the folks casting judgement on Miers with incomplete information are more interested in having THEIR views heard instead of hearing those of the nominee.

19 posted on 10/08/2005 7:38:52 PM PDT by dirtboy (Drool overflowed my buffer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: dirtboy

When and if she lets her views be known, which she as of late has not, then you can call for waiting. And if Bork has been reading her dossier and such, why does he need to show restraint? If he's formed an opinion I have no problem hearing it. He's giving us more than she is and I'll bet you more than she will when the hearings start.


22 posted on 10/08/2005 7:43:17 PM PDT by ShadowDancer (Stupid people make my brain sad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: dirtboy

"I'm beginning to think the folks casting judgement on Miers with incomplete information are more interested in having THEIR views heard instead of hearing those of the nominee."

Well spoken!


64 posted on 10/08/2005 9:17:08 PM PDT by GGpaX4DumpedTea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson