Wrong. She will give a judicial philosophy. And some specific views. She will not cite how she would rule on specific cases. As she should not.
You're attempting to draw an equivalence where one cannot be fairly drawn.
Wrong again.
It's called restraint. Something sorely missing from the anti-Miers crowd.
And manners. Scalia appears to be a real gentleman. He says what he thinks on issues in his rulings but is never personally rude.