[Reactionary]

"Bushbots."

That's rather cute. But the idiot "Bushbots" somehow knew that Roberts was a good candidate, didn't they? And the little bots knew that nominating someone without a paper trail was a good idea, too. And you know what? The Bushbots nailed it and the nomination.

But now the little bots have it all wrong, huh?

[Reactionary]

Bush has managed two wars, a war against a worldwide terrorist enemy, a natural disaster, and 9/11. He has not had the help of the Europeans. He hasn't had the luxury of relying on the UN. He has not had any help from the media. He hasn't had the help of his own Senate. He's done all of those things alone. And you know what? He's done an excellent job. But now all *anyone* can do is pile on.

The attitudes that people have adopted here lately absolutely disgust me. Bush isn't a perfect, but he has had a hell of a lot on his plate. And you're damn right that I'm demanding loyalty. Bush deserves it.

[the gillman@blacklagoon.com]

We won't KNOW about Roberts for a year or so, and if he's a bad pick the Republic is over.

Harriet won't even matter at that point.

Should Roberts be a stout Constitutionalist, we still, absolutely, have to get, an absolute fire breather for the associate position or we still are over and done with.

We need at least one more after that to survive as a Republic.

No time to be guessing.

[TAdams8591]

Most conservatives, bot or not, supported Roberts even if they were uncomfortable that he was a STEALTH candidate.