Since he's an angry old grump, that makes himwrong, or does it make him a DU'er?
Not wrong, just not a reliable witness.
"Since he's an angry old grump, that makes himwrong, or does it make him a DU'er?"
Well it certainly makes him less than professional. How does he know that she has absolutely no background in Constitutional law whatever? She is supposedly a "mystery" candidate. Isn't a judge supposed to get all the facts before he makes a judgment? Was he present when she was advising the President and other White House figures (perhaps on Constitutional law)?