Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gondramB
Looks like this would nail the Clinton campaign, unless they can successfully claim that the expense report wasn't accurate or that somehow the campaign was not responsible for those expenses - maybe by claiming Paul wasn't authorized to spend that money (or that much money)on behalf of the campaign.

Who is going to wield the hammer?

15 posted on 10/08/2005 12:48:12 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: EGPWS

Not the current AG. All anybody needs to do is look at how the U. S. Attorney's office took a dive at Rosen's trial. Toward the ent the gov. atty. even said Hillary didn't benefit from what Rosen did.


27 posted on 10/08/2005 1:19:24 PM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson