Looks like this would nail the Clinton campaign, unless they can successfully claim that the expense report wasn't accurate or that somehow the campaign was not responsible for those expenses - maybe by claiming Paul wasn't authorized to spend that money (or that much money)on behalf of the campaign.
Not the current AG. All anybody needs to do is look at how the U. S. Attorney's office took a dive at Rosen's trial. Toward the ent the gov. atty. even said Hillary didn't benefit from what Rosen did.
27 posted on 10/08/2005 1:19:24 PM PDT by libstripper