[manwiththehands]

I, for one love to say "Bush's fault!" on these threads. It takes the automatic MSM/Lib/'Rat's first response away from them. Rush Limbaugh does it best: illustrating absurdity by being absurd. By the way, cliche's are BUSH'S FAULT! BWAHAHAHAHAA!

[Strategerist]

It takes the automatic MSM/Lib/'Rat's first response away from them.

I've seen this justification for the "Bush's Fault" garbage repeatedly, and, to be blunt, it's idiotic. All it does is annoy people who read FR (very few of whom are Democrats or part of the MSM) and it doesn't have the slightest effect in combatting or reducing the efforts of the Left to blame things on Bush.

Though, considering the justification comes from people stupid enough to actually think that 20 "Bush's Fault!" replies on a 40 post thread is hilarious, that shouldn't be suprising.

[RedStateRocker]

All cyber communities have their own 'in jokes'.

On the Fenderforum.com (GREAT place for musicians) it's "Maple vs. Rosewood; originally referring to a very personalized and often important choice in guitar fingerboards, now, years later, extended to choice of casket, crib or cricket bat.

On Slashdot.org it's not a real discussion until there has been at least one off-topic reference to Natalie Portman, hot grits or "It's all Microsoft's fault". The universality of 'in jokes' indicates their deeper function(s). Obviously I've had too much coffee this morning:-)