Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge rules against Homeland Security
MercuryNews.com ^ | OCTOBER 7, 2005 | AP

Posted on 10/07/2005 1:59:15 PM PDT by radar101

Edited on 10/07/2005 2:05:58 PM PDT by Sidebar Moderator. [history]

WASHINGTON - A federal judge Friday ruled against the Department of Homeland Security in a labor dispute over proposed workplace rules that would reduce the power of labor unions at the department, which has 160,000 employees.

U.S. District Judge Rosemary Collyer said the department's proposal falls short because it leaves open avenues to unilaterally disavow lawful contracts. One provision embraced by DHS, the judge noted, says that homeland security managers may "take whatever other actions may be necessary to carry out the department's mission."


(Excerpt) Read more at mercurynews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: antidhs; dhs; prounion; ruling

1 posted on 10/07/2005 1:59:18 PM PDT by radar101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: radar101

Just what we need. Unions in control of homeland security.


2 posted on 10/07/2005 2:02:13 PM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101

we don't have a prayer. the spine is limp and the brains gone soft.


3 posted on 10/07/2005 2:02:15 PM PDT by wildcatf4f3 (admittedly too unstable for public office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101
One provision embraced by DHS, the judge noted, says that homeland security managers may "take whatever other actions may be necessary to carry out the department's mission."

In other words, to hell with keeping our country safe. Gotta make sure those government employees aren't nudged into doing actual work like people in the real world, where results are expected...

4 posted on 10/07/2005 2:04:58 PM PDT by COBOL2Java (Many Democrats are not weak Americans. But nearly all weak Americans are Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paul51
Just what we need. Unions in control of homeland security.

It's worse than that. These are Federal unions, in which it's guaranteed that 5% of the workforce does 95% of the work. The rest of the workers can be found at the coffee maker.

5 posted on 10/07/2005 2:07:14 PM PDT by COBOL2Java (Many Democrats are not weak Americans. But nearly all weak Americans are Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java
It won't be long before some judge agrees with some other lunatic's notion we should unionize the military
6 posted on 10/07/2005 2:08:00 PM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: radar101
Entrenched bureaucrats,unqualified political appointees,even less qualified affirmative action candidates, union morons & thugs...running the country...

Next thing ya know they will be hiring ex-KGB or Stasi State Security to get things really organized....

What's not too like?

7 posted on 10/07/2005 2:09:42 PM PDT by joesnuffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101
U.S. District Judge Rosemary Collyer said the department's proposal falls short because it leaves open avenues to unilaterally disavow lawful contracts

Idiot judge. DODs service contracts are severable and can be canceled with a minimal amount of notice.

8 posted on 10/07/2005 2:11:50 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (Bush to Blanco to "tighten up", so she called her plastic surgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

There is no reason to believe HS contracts would be written any differently.


9 posted on 10/07/2005 2:12:37 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (Bush to Blanco to "tighten up", so she called her plastic surgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: radar101
One provision embraced by DHS, the judge noted, says that homeland security managers may "take whatever other actions may be necessary to carry out the department's mission."

Can't let that happen. I thought this was what we fought for when we created the DHS? Is the judge saying the law doesn't allow this, or that he thinks the law shouldn't allow it even though it does?

10 posted on 10/07/2005 2:26:35 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

heh. Is their a Judge's Union? It never ends..


11 posted on 10/07/2005 2:31:39 PM PDT by Skeeve14 (1980's RR-Communism Evil Empire 2000's GWB-Communism good for Business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: zip

ping


12 posted on 10/07/2005 2:52:19 PM PDT by Mrs Zip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Skeeve14

Let me guess Rosemary was appointed by Clinton, probably a Law School classmate.


13 posted on 10/07/2005 3:00:54 PM PDT by Jack Ian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson