I could care less how well she comports with biblical principle, so long as she fulfills the requirements enumerated by so many other skeptics of the Miers nomination, e.g. a scrupulous adherence to the Constitution's original intent, a willingness to buck elite-but misguided-opinion, and a judicial philosophy that will stand the test of time.
I've read ad nauseum about those, who reference themselves as conservatives, eschewing the religious convictions of Ms. Miers, and anecdotal evidence thereof, while failing to remember the the Constitution of the United States of America is rooted in Judeo-Christian principles.
Such sophistry.
The opposition party has enough ammo. It defies any sense of logic that those that purport to be against those principles which define the liberal leadership of the Democrats continue to disparage, and refuse to trust in the Man from Austin.
I suggest all pause and do some introspection.
Do those that engage in histrionics over this choice, albeit important, for the Supreme Court truly believe that G.W. Bush is deliberately puting this nomination forth to undermine the principles that he has clearly enumerated?
I've never met President Bush, yet, I know him.
Now, flame on. Matters not to me.