Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bkepley
We wouldn't even be discussing the nuclear option if Bush had not nominated well known conservatives only to have been assured there would be fillibusters.

What??? The only reason we're discussing the nuke option is because people are searching for excuses for GW's horrible selection. And there have not been ANY filibusters. The GOP Senate LEADERS never forced a real filibuster, wussies that they are. If it hadn't been for the RINOs, we wouldn't even have the few lower court appointments we got, and that's because the GOP is ineffective. Hatch, Frist, et al are worthless. The stupid RINOs got us what little we have gotten. And that was after yeeeeeaaaars of inaction by the leadership.

Why not force a filibuster? What's so bad about standing up for what you believe in? But I guess it's easier to blame someone else.

15 posted on 10/06/2005 3:04:38 PM PDT by Huck ("Sometimes you're better off not knowing how much you've been had." --Bob Dylan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Huck
Why not force a filibuster? What's so bad about standing up for what you believe in?

I would have preferred it but Bush has put up excellent judges only to have them shot down and that is when the term "nuclear option" was born thus we would not be discussing the "nuclear option" at all had it not been for Bush's picks in the past. Q.E.D. Bush I would have simply avoided the fight in the first place in my opinion.

19 posted on 10/06/2005 3:17:25 PM PDT by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson