Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thoughtomator

You see? That wasn't so hard now was it?

Now we know where you stand, and from what viewpoint you derive your opinions.

I just happen to disagree with you, but that's life.


57 posted on 10/06/2005 9:22:52 PM PDT by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: coconutt2000

Fair enough. I believe that President Bush's interests conflict with that of the people of the United States of America in several areas, and that he cannot always be trusted. In this case - as in others, e.g. immigration, spending, the relationship with Saudi Arabia - I think the nomination is more the product of his personal intersts than that of the country. Where he works for the nation's well-being, I am quick to support him. Where he works against it I oppose him.

Moreover I have a lot of unresolved concerns about the nominee herself, as enumerated in previous posts I have made here on the subject.

Knowing the President is as accomplished a strategic actor as he is, I wonder if this nomination may be a ploy. The expected scenario was that the nominee would be opposed vehemently by the Left, which would place a rightward limit the President's choices. Perhaps instead he has contrived to put a leftward limit on what the Democrats could hope for by reversing the situation and provoking the vehement opposition from the Right. But even if so, I don't like it, because with the lack of spine evident in the Senate GOP she just might make it in.


60 posted on 10/06/2005 9:42:53 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Corporatism is not conservatism - don't mistake this President for a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson