Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thoughtomator
"It's not "progressive" Republicans making a stink about this, it's grassroots patriots wondering whose interests she will serve on the court and how well she will serve them."

Oh. So you've dropped the issue as to whether or not "she's qualified," aye?

Well, that was quick.

19 posted on 10/06/2005 3:39:27 PM PDT by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Reactionary

That's one issue, but the bigger issues are the obvious conflict of interest, the unanswered question of why so many better-qualified candidates were passed over, and all the unresolved question marks about who she really is and what she believes.

She appears to be the personal agent of the President. And that's not the role of a Supreme Court Justice.


26 posted on 10/06/2005 4:08:29 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Corporatism is not conservatism - don't mistake this President for a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson