Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Applying the Principles of War to Harriet Miers SCOTUS Nomination

MOOSEMUSS. Yes, MOOSEMUSS. That is what came to mind when the discussion amongst the right about the Harriet Miers nomination went into full tilt yesterday … MOOSEMUSS.

Hat tip to Mr. Atos for planting the seed with his Bangalore Torpedo piece, and after all the rancor yesterday, I thought, MOOSEMUSS.

I don’t buy the theory that in an instant, that the President, who incidentally, got the GWOT right, and the John Roberts nomination right, who has Dick Cheney as his VP and Condi Rice as his SOS … blew a gasket and has gotten this completely wrong. I thought … maybe … MOOSEMUSS.

I think that the President had many possible choices here, but I think he chose to be a bit more devious than he is being given credit for. I think he, as Mr. Atos points out, is taking this opportunity to covertly attack the leadership and structure of the Democrat base. Why do I think that? MOOSEMUSS.

MOOSEMUSS is the easily learned acronym that highlights the nine, generally accepted, Principles of War. Notice I didn’t say battle. Battle … a general encounter between armies, ships of war, or airplanes. War … a period of declared and open hostilities. For the uninitiated, fighting wars … protracted periods of combat, and fighting battles … encounters between warring forces, are two entirely different matters and require two entirely different schemes. One, war, requires strategic thinking, and battles, require tactical thinking. These are two entirely different operational levels.

So, when I think MOOSEMUSS, I am not considering the tactical, I am considering the strategic.

Let’s look at the Miers nomination and see if, somehow, the guy who got the GWOT, may also get the Principles of War, when it comes to waging a long term strategic campaign against the Democrats.

M – Mass – Concentrate Combat Power at decisive time and place.

I think the President gets it … this is not the time to force an all out fight with the Democrats … he is not willing to expend all of his political capital in order to push through a more controversial nomination. Let’s chip away until the mid-term election, but let’s don’t give them any additional ammo going into them.

O – Objective – Direct every military operation against a clearly defined, decisive and obtainable objective.

Again, this nomination, while important, is not the final conservative objective … I would view that as the ultimate emasculation of the Democrat Party to the point it is ineffective as an organization. This nomination is an intermediate objective, but not the final objective … no need to expend all of your ammo here.

O – Offensive – Seize, retain and exploit the initiative.

This nomination is a home run here. The Dems were obviously preparing for the worst … basically any other, very conservative judge, they were ready. They would have come out of the box on Monday morning with their canned offensive and dominated the evening news with their media blitz. The President, with this nomination, redefined the fight, put the Dems on defense, and is able to maintain the initiative, against the Democrat party for the foreseeable future. Harry Reid endorsing Miers, is a much a capitulation as it is an endorsement. The President put the Dems on their heels and took away their ammo …

S – Surprise – Strike the enemy at a time, a place and in a manner for which he is unprepared.

See above- Offensive. This move completely disarmed the Dems. They were immediately frozen, and have yet to get any traction on this issue, in any coherent way. This was achieved by coming across with a surprise nomination, not by attacking their prepared defenses.

-snip-

(Major Mike in My Sandman, October 5, 2005)
To Read This Article Click Here

1 posted on 10/06/2005 2:25:37 PM PDT by quidnunc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: quidnunc

Justification: "We should purposely nominate un-qualified people"

Just pathetic.


2 posted on 10/06/2005 2:31:43 PM PDT by Betaille ("And if the stars burn out there's only fire to blame" -Duran Duran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc
This issue is not the Strategery of President Bush, it is about the qualifications of Harriet Miers to be a productive member of the SCOTUS.

The people writing these defensive articles need to start coming to HER defense instead of that of the President.
3 posted on 10/06/2005 2:35:47 PM PDT by msnimje (If you suspect this post might need a sarcasm tag..... it does!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

Good reads..I welcome the new insights.


4 posted on 10/06/2005 2:38:26 PM PDT by MEG33 (GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

This is not the result of any strategy. It is a result of having too little courage to do battle with the enemies of the republic.


13 posted on 10/06/2005 3:24:13 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Corporatism is not conservatism - don't mistake this President for a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

MOOSEMESS is more like it.


15 posted on 10/06/2005 3:29:33 PM PDT by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc
MOOSEMUSS. Yes, MOOSEMUSS. That is what came to mind when the discussion amongst the right about the Harriet Miers nomination went into full tilt yesterday … MOOSEMUSS.

This is the kind of smug, delusional ramblings one would expect from KOS.
Very disappointing.
63 posted on 10/08/2005 12:21:54 PM PDT by counterpunch (Save the GOP - withdraw Miers now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson