Skip to comments.
The X Factor of Harriet Miers (MOOSEMUSS and Miers)
Tech Central Station ^
| October 6, 2005
| Douglas Kern
Posted on 10/06/2005 2:25:34 PM PDT by quidnunc
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 last
To: quidnunc; Betaille
"Good enough" is not satisfactory for a Supreme Court nomination.
I would have settled for "good," but President Bush appears to have ruled that out.
To: thoughtomator
I appreciate your point of view but I don't see that it boils down to anything but a sophisticated version of "trust me". I think you are probably right that there is an element to that. There is an element to that in every nomination since we never have all the facts about candidate that the President does. But whatever our criticisms about this Presidents other decisions or actions or lack of action, he's been faultless on judicial nominations. Doesn't he deserve that trust in this case? For that matter, doesn't Miers based on her work on judicial nominations over the last 5 years?
To: quidnunc
MOOSEMUSS. Yes, MOOSEMUSS. That is what came to mind when the discussion amongst the right about the Harriet Miers nomination went into full tilt yesterday
MOOSEMUSS.
This is the kind of smug, delusional ramblings one would expect from KOS.
Very disappointing.
63
posted on
10/08/2005 12:21:54 PM PDT
by
counterpunch
(Save the GOP - withdraw Miers now)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson