Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reactors? We'll Take Thirty, Please
BusinessWeek Online ^ | October 3, 2005

Posted on 10/05/2005 5:15:21 AM PDT by kidd

Westinghouse, GE, and their nuclear rivals are chasing $50 billion in Chinese power-plant deals Power to the People's Republic! That could easily be the slogan of the nuclear power executives winging their way to Beijing these days to pitch next-generation reactor designs, downplay rivals' plans, and woo the Communist Party leadership. President Hu Jintao's government is committed to spending $50 billion to increase nuclear power generation capacity from 8.7 million kilowatts today to 40 million kilowatts by 2020. That's one of the largest buildouts in the industry's history. And by the time that $50 billion is spent, some 30 new reactors will be pumping power to China's most important cities, in addition to the nine operating today....

(Excerpt) Read more at businessweek.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: china; nuclear; nuclearplants; redchina
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
A fairly accurate article. The rest of the article describes how Westinghouse and Areva are bidding on these project. Areva seems to have a slight edge.

Since China doesn't have the regulatory restrictions that US utilities have, they will be 3-5 years ahead of us in power generation. And an adequate power supply is one of the keys to economic success.

1 posted on 10/05/2005 5:15:24 AM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kidd
The Left can hardly find a handier tool to cripple America's economic ability to project liberty around the world than to cripple and starve our energy infrastructure.

They are on the road to pulling our plug and drying our nozzles.


2 posted on 10/05/2005 5:23:52 AM PDT by nathanbedford (Lose your borders, lose your citizenship; lose your citizenship, lose your Bill of Rights)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kidd

Governments, by their very nature, cannot help but mis-allocate economic resources. The Chinese hold hundreds of billions of dollars of US government and agency debt. If they are going to mis-spend them, let them throw our dollars back at US companies. Meanwhile, this funding helps to further the development of nuclear power that is more safe than the plants we have that are currently in service, plants that we will soon have to start mothballing when their safe operation can no longer be assured.


3 posted on 10/05/2005 5:24:55 AM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kidd

Given the balance of trade, the administration should be in a good position to pressure the Chinese to go with a US company. A deal could be cut where GE buys Westinghouse on the condition that that they get strong backing from the President. $50 billion would go a long way to restarting a nuclear industry in the U.S.


4 posted on 10/05/2005 6:30:49 AM PDT by Jeff F
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff F

Dick Cheney is reportedly been a big advocate of supporting Westinghouse. Westinghouse may be foreign owned, but 99.9% of its work force is composed of United States citizens.


5 posted on 10/05/2005 6:51:53 AM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kidd

We'd (the USA) better get on the nuclear bus, too.


6 posted on 10/05/2005 7:12:13 AM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kidd

Westinghouse is foreign owned?


7 posted on 10/05/2005 7:24:14 AM PDT by AmericanDave (God bless .......and MORE COWBELL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

Yes we need to re-start nuclear power building; just make sure the mob is kept out of the contract bidding (remember china syndrome?). No fudging on weld x-rays now.......


8 posted on 10/05/2005 7:26:23 AM PDT by AmericanDave (God bless .......and MORE COWBELL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AmericanDave

Yes. Presently owned by BNFL (British Nuclear Fuels LTD).
BNFL has been very good to Westinghouse (has managed it properly) and consequently Westinghouse has been very profitable to BNFL.

Previously Westinghouse was owned by CBS. CBS didn't have a clue how to run a Nuclear Services company (lots of lawyers in nearly every aspect of operations).

There was a push a couple of years ago to make BNFL a privately owned company, but that was rejected by Parliment. Since then Parliment decided that it was outside of BNFL's charter to have an autonomous United States based firm in a state-run company. Consequently, Westinghouse is being sold.

Most of the interested buyers are either entirely American held or have an American partner.


9 posted on 10/05/2005 7:41:29 AM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kidd

The Chinks are being smarter than we are. WE should be increasing our power output by building reactors and sending envirofascists to Northern Canada to freeze in the dark.


10 posted on 10/05/2005 7:43:07 AM PDT by Little Ray (I'm a reactionary, hirsute, gun-owning, knuckle dragging, Christian Neanderthal and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kidd
The Brits' the ONLY foreign country I'd trust.... Thanks for the info.
11 posted on 10/05/2005 7:50:43 AM PDT by AmericanDave (God bless .......and MORE COWBELL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kidd
Westinghouse may be foreign owned, but 99.9% of its work force is composed of United States citizens.

They are actually for sale again right now (the Blair government decided that it shouldn't own private foreign companies) so hopefully some US group will purchase Westinghouse back from the Brits (who bought it in 1998 from CBS. But having them being owned by the Brits was one hell of a lot better than being owned by the dick-heads at CBS.

12 posted on 10/05/2005 7:53:58 AM PDT by Ditto ( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kidd

If we can't get them built here, it will be almost as good to get them built there. Their existence anywhere in the world takes pressure off oil.


13 posted on 10/05/2005 8:12:59 AM PDT by arthurus (Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford
The Left can hardly find a handier tool to cripple America's economic ability to project liberty around the world than to cripple and starve our energy infrastructure.

Can't blame this one entirely on the Left, although they are primarily responsible for all of the anti-nuclear propaganda. The enemy is us, since the public has opposed the building of nuclear power plants since TMI.

14 posted on 10/05/2005 8:49:10 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kidd

$1-2 billion per reactor seems absurdly low.


15 posted on 10/05/2005 8:51:16 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

"$1-2 billion per reactor seems absurdly low."

It's a fire sale: Buy 1, get 1 free.


16 posted on 10/05/2005 8:54:35 AM PDT by toddlintown (Your papers please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kidd

Lucky Chinese! Why don't we send all our environmental extremists over there to try to stop them?


17 posted on 10/05/2005 8:58:00 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
"$1-2 billion per reactor seems absurdly low."

Not when you factor in China's cheap labor plus the fact that they will not have to deal with any environmental impact issues in building the reactors there.

18 posted on 10/05/2005 9:03:56 AM PDT by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
I believe it was Carter who imposed a moratorium of some sort against the construction of new fission power plants. His reasoning was that he was afraid terrorists would somehow get hold of some of our spent nuclear fuel to build a bomb to use against us.

In one brilliant stroke, the peanut farmer constrained us to a future of ever more greenhouse gas production, mercury poisoning of our finest freshwater fishing lakes (coal burning), and an economy even more susceptible to terrorist activity than what might otherwise have been.

This policy has been politically difficult, if not impossible, to change ever since.

We need to change this NOW.
19 posted on 10/05/2005 9:41:00 AM PDT by MRadtke (NOT the baseball player)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
Besides Three Mile Island and Chernoble, the Left has served up "China Syndrome."


20 posted on 10/05/2005 10:39:19 AM PDT by nathanbedford (Lose your borders, lose your citizenship; lose your citizenship, lose your Bill of Rights)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson