Posted on 10/04/2005 8:27:16 AM PDT by Fun Bob
Thank you so very much
I'd say Proposition H feels good-on the whole.
San Francisco where the state govt is operated by tulips who tiptoe in the garden.
Make that city govt is operated by tuilips.
Keep the UN, and every other level of government AWAY from the internet.
No. Already decided and "stare decisis" applies...
the infowarrior
This is the argument that liberal judicial activists and their legislative counterparts use to defend laws that are clearly unconstitutional, including the so-called "pro-choice" right to (therapeutic)abortion-on-demand.
The term "co-conspirators" could apply to these liberals, except that they do it in the open with much clever Orwellian double-think. How amusing it is, too, that liberals can refer to conservative judges as "judicial activists"!
Well, if Supreme Court justices are busy striking down those acts of Congress, the President and lower courts that exceed the Constitutional limits on their authority, then I suppose conservative judges may be seen as "activist" in that light! Or would restorers of balance be more accurate?
[Believe it or not, there is a group called Libertarians for Life (www.L4L.org)].
The actual meaning of the term legally is "let the decision stand", although I do not disagree with your opinion as to factuality. What my point was, is that given the judicial climate of today, there is no possible way Newsome would be held legally accountable for the results of his "utopia"...
the infowarrior
I too visited San Fran once... when i was 5 yrs old.. I will never venture back there. free internet? Anything that comes out of San Fran has to be taken with a grain of salt... well mabey a whole salt shaker full! Hopefully that city breaks off and starts drifting out in the pacific soon!
The next "fundamental human right" of the left?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4309012.stm
Dane fights for state-funded sex
A disabled Danish man is fighting for the state to pay for him to have a prostitute visit him at home.
Torben Hansen, who has cerebral palsy, which severely affects his speech and mobility, believes his local authority should pay the extra charge he incurs when he hires a sex worker - because his disability means he cannot go to see them. His case is currently being considered.
In Denmark, local authorities compensate disabled people for extra costs incurred because of their disability.
"I want them to cover the extra expenses for the prostitutes to get here, because it's a lot more expensive getting them to come to my home rather than me going to a brothel," Mr Hansen told BBC World Service's Outlook programme.
"It's a necessity for me. I can't move very well, and it's impossible for me to go there."
Unbelievable! People lacking moral character arrive at asinine ways to spend other people's money in their quest for "my rights".
If he wins, I'm going...
(Only kidding, of course. We know what government issued cheese is like, and what government issued health care is like...imagine, if you will, what government supplied sex would be like...eeeewwwww)
Ha ha! Good point but seriously...this guy is already buying sex in Amsterdam. Can't get much more eeeeewwww than that.
Good God, how true...scary...
Boston: Sides chosen in Logan WiFi battle ~ Wireless and airport lobbies join dispute
I also linked back to this thread.....getting interesting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.