Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Overweight threat' for most of US
Herald Sun ^ | 4 October 2005

Posted on 10/03/2005 11:33:03 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher

THE US obesity problem might be more serious than previously believed and most adults in the United States were at risk of becoming overweight or obese, US researchers said today.

In a government study that followed 4000 participants over 30 years, researchers found that 90 per cent of men and 70 per cent of women were overweight or later became overweight.

"National surveys and other studies have told us that the United States has a major weight problem, but this study suggests that we could have an even more serious degree of overweight and obesity (cases) over the next few decades," Elizabeth Nabel, director of the US National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, said.

Excess weight and obesity increase the risk of poor health and can lead to diabetes, high blood pressure, heart disease, stroke, breathing problems and some cancers, Ms Nabel said.

"We hope these results will serve as a wake-up call to Americans of all ages."

The study's results, which were published in this week's issue of the Annals of Internal Medicine, were based on assessments of body mass index, a standard measure of weight relative to height.

The volunteers for the study were white, from the town of Framingham in the northeastern state of Massachusetts.

Researchers said their study might underestimate the problem among Hispanic and African-American communities, which tend to have higher rates of excess weight.

According to the government's National Centre for Health Statistics, an estimated 65 per cent of US adults over the age of 20 are either overweight or obese, with 30 per cent of adults considered obese.

The study found that making it to middle age at a healthy weight was no guarantee for staying at that weight.

About one in five women and one in four men in the study deteriorated during four years, gaining excess weight or becoming obese.

"Taking simple steps to make sure that the overall number of calories you consume do not exceed the amount you burn can play a major role in lowering your risk for many chronic conditions," Ms Nabel said.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fat; fatbastards; lardasses; obese; obesity; teddykennedy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
Lard Asses from MASSACHUSETTS? Surely not! They should complain to their Senator...
1 posted on 10/03/2005 11:33:06 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Guess we can put global warming on the back burner. Whew, that one was scaaaarrrrryyyyy.


2 posted on 10/03/2005 11:38:20 PM PDT by taxesareforever (Government is running amuck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
A lot of hungry folks in other parts of the world would like to have this kind of problem.
3 posted on 10/03/2005 11:39:55 PM PDT by AndyTheBear (Disastrous social experimentation is the opiate of elitist snobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

As a friend of mine uses to say, while patting himself on the belly: "It is paid for!"


4 posted on 10/03/2005 11:43:21 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GSlob

Lets mandate a 30 hour work week. That way we would all have a little extra time for softball; and we would all starve from the economic impact.


5 posted on 10/03/2005 11:45:57 PM PDT by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

I think this had a previous thread but I am too fat to find it.


6 posted on 10/03/2005 11:51:04 PM PDT by Daralundy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Tax every over weight person an extra $2000.00 per year and give everyone NOT over weight $1000.00. Anyone on the government tit has one year to trim down or we cut them off. It's time for some tough love. Besides, I can use a extra thousand.


7 posted on 10/04/2005 12:05:14 AM PDT by Razz Barry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Razz Barry

The surtaxes and credits should be per pound, not per person.


8 posted on 10/04/2005 12:08:48 AM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

I better get off my 'puter and go do some butt crunches!


9 posted on 10/04/2005 12:09:41 AM PDT by derllak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
Image hosted by TinyPic.com
"Obesity? what a bunch off baloney."
10 posted on 10/04/2005 12:56:30 AM PDT by Old Seadog (Birthdays start out being fun. But too many of them will kill you..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
I regularly walk 10 miles at a time, without getting tired or becoming out of breath. I'm in great shape.

But according to the federal government's BMI index, I am "overweight." I am male, 5'6", and I weigh 160 pounds.

The government greatly exaggerates the number of people who are "overweight."

11 posted on 10/04/2005 1:00:00 AM PDT by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Razz Barry
Tax every over weight person an extra $2000.00 per year and give everyone NOT over weight $1000.00. Anyone on the government tit has one year to trim down or we cut them off. It's time for some tough love. Besides, I can use a extra thousand.

So we're going to give the folks who have gone to drastic measures to "get" thin (stomach stapling or anorexia), tax credits because they are "more" healthy than those with extra lbs.

Truth is, weight is just one measurement of health, and in and of itself, without considering other factors, IMHO, is not a very good measurement.

12 posted on 10/04/2005 2:12:24 AM PDT by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

The Department of Health must obtain these weight standards from Ethiopia. They are completely unrealistic from what I've seen. Someone had posted a list of allegedly "overweight" movie stars. You could see through half the people on the list. According to the list, President Bush was overweight. I think they need to send the people who created these standards BACK to the team that invented "Global warming".


13 posted on 10/04/2005 2:28:22 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

"researchers found that 90 per cent of men and 70 per cent of women were overweight or later became overweight."

Thats 100% crap or will become so.

That is how you skew a result to come up with a foregone conclusion.


14 posted on 10/04/2005 2:52:49 AM PDT by Adder (Can we bring back stoning again? Please?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Razz Barry

Transfer of wealth from the fat to the skinny...women and children, hardest hit.


15 posted on 10/04/2005 3:09:00 AM PDT by SamAdams76 (What Would Howard Roarke Do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: grundle
But according to the federal government's BMI index, I am "overweight." I am male, 5'6", and I weigh 160 pounds.

Well evidently you need a diet to go along with all that walking.

16 posted on 10/04/2005 3:09:42 AM PDT by SamAdams76 (What Would Howard Roarke Do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: grundle

In 2000, my cycling coach was 6 foot and 210 pounds. According to the BMI, that makes him overweight, and at risk of obesity. If he was so unhealthy (according to the "numbers") at the time, then what the hell was he doing competing in the Olympic Trials?
Ooops, silly me, things like % body fat don't count. The definition of "healthy" is really determined by gay fashion designers.


17 posted on 10/04/2005 3:24:31 AM PDT by Fred Hayek (Liberalism is a mental disorder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Fred Hayek
The definition of "healthy" is really determined by gay fashion designers.

Deserves repeating.

18 posted on 10/04/2005 4:10:14 AM PDT by NaughtiusMaximus (The liberals promised to move to Canada but they lied . . . bwaaaaah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: grundle

"But according to the federal government's BMI index, I am "overweight." I am male, 5'6", and I weigh 160 pounds. "

I am male 5'10" weigh 220 pounds. Run two miles a day, play ice hockey and do not eat between meals. My BFI is 20 and according to the weight nazis, I am 50 pounds over weight.



19 posted on 10/04/2005 4:10:52 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Liberal Talking Point - Bush = Hitler ... Republican Talking Point - Let the Liberals Talk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NaughtiusMaximus

FWIW, I don't know any lean people with Type II diabetes.


20 posted on 10/04/2005 4:11:25 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson