[pcottraux]

I clicked on that Condi Rice movie and watched the little flash animation movie.

It was scarier than any horror movie I've ever seen!!!! Brrr....I'm going to have nightmares!!!! Those animated computer faces...so...lifeless, so...chilling.

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[Deetes]

LOL

[pcottraux]

Although, admittedly, I just clicked on that Hillary nanopresident thing, and that was even scarier.

Looked nothing like her.

[Mia T]

ping

[pcottraux]

Man, all your flash animations are scary! They're freakin' me out, all of them! Do you really need all those little horror movies everywhere?

[Liberty Valance]

Great job as usual Mia T - thanks for posting :o)

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

thanx for your original skepticism. Truly.
It inspired this geena-condi morph
and the fleshing out of the underlying theory.

[Mia T]

CORRECTION:

The reviews miss the point of the show, (i.e., the show is not optional but necessary (though hardly sufficient) if clinton is to prevail), because the reviews fail to identify missus clinton's problem in the first place. And circular reasoning compounds the error.

[Bellflower]

An interested ping for later Mia T.

[Wolverine]

bump

[jla]

bump

[jla]

bump

[Excuse_My_Bellicosity]

While channel surfing, I saw an advertisement on ABC for Commander-In-Chief. In the ad, they said that 26 million people watched the show last week. The Nielsen ratings for last week ( http://tv.zap2it.com/tveditorial/tve_main/1,1002,272|||weekly,00.html ) show 16 million viewers. ABC embellished by 10 million people! If they actually drew in the 26 million as claimed, it would put them right up with Desperate Housewives, which they obviously weren't. They finished #7. Did anybody else catch that?

[beyond the sea]

You don't see her corruption. Her ineptitude. Her banality. ---------------- You don't see her rage. Her coldness.

"I think for me, the sickest and scariest kind of rage is the Hillary Clinton kind of rage. You know, the perpetual permafrost smile she wears that's hiding a well of fury deeper than Barry White's voice during a bout of pneumonia." -- Dennis Miller

Yes .............. it is seen.

[Mia T]

REVERSE MORPH FOR HILLARY

by Mia T, 03.01.06

 

 

As the inaugural study in the Washington Post-Political Communication Lab collaboration, we studied attraction to familiar faces. A considerable body of research in social psychology derived from the classic studies of Stanford psychologist Robert Zajonc demonstrates that people evaluate objects they have encountered previously more favorably than novel objects, even when they do not consciously recognize the previously-encountered objects. In other words, "mere exposure" is sufficient to increase an object's likeability.

We are interested in the question because in the political arena, there is ample evidence of a familiarity bias in voting behavior. The fact that incumbents habitually win re-election by convincing margins may be attributable, in part, to the higher level of recognition of the incumbent's name and face.

We used digital face morphing technology to create relatively familiar and unfamiliar faces. More than 2,200 individuals participated in the study, a part of an ongoing collaborative effort by Stanford researchers Jeremy Bailenson, Nathan Collins, Shanto Iyengar, and Nick Yee.

What's in a Face?
Testing the Familiarity-Likeability Connection
By Shanto Iyengar and Richard Morin
Sunday, February 26, 2006; 5:04 PM

hat a remarkably representative baseline photo of missus clinton.

My, my. Is there anything the lefties won't try to make this creature acceptable?

They've tried morphing hillary into Condi by way of Geena Davis and that didn't work.

(viewing requires Flash Player 7, available HERE) STEP 1

(viewing requires Flash Player 7, available HERE) STEP2

 

So now they're experimenting with reversing the process.

Good thinking!

 

READ MORE