Whenanycourt violates the clean and unamiguous language of the Constitution a Fraud is perpetrated,and no-one is bound to obey it."State v.Sutton There are many legal precedents one could and all should point to that clearly suggest this
Judge is perpetrating Fraud. The modern myth of neutrality mandated by the way the court has interpreted the constitution for years is not and ought not be construed as anything but Fraud.All any need do is read the Late Justice Rhenquist in Wallace v. Jaffree-- or the Dissent of Arthur
Goldberg in Abington v. Schempp-or best yet read the freaking First Amendment(and how it was interpreted by the
men who wrote that instrument )and it becomes clear what these Judges are doing is a lot of things None of it Lawful-
And none of it upholding the US Constitution-by interpreting it as it was written and intended to be understoood by ALL.