[ml1954]

Good at Google I see.

Note that in (i) and (ii) an attribute of the whole is cited first. An attribute of the whole is cited first and then it is pointed out that the parts do not have that attribute.

In (iii), there really is no whole.

Your logic is backwards.

[SmartCitizen]

No. The chimp DNA theory concludes that similarity in DNA (a PART) proves common ancestory of the entire species (or WHOLE species). :)