Things seem remarkably quiet this fine Saturday morning. So, I haven't been following this trial at all; I can really do without the same tired old ID nonsense and the typical scientific demolishment of it. Anyhow, what I'm wondering is who you think's winning the trial. Any sense of that yet?
It's not a jury trial, so it's all up to the judge -- a republican appointed by Bush the younger. We were discussing the judge in an earlier thread, and the possibility of his being a party hack who will, perhaps, do the popular thing. No way to know.
On the merits, the plaintiffs seem to be winning. Here is something on the possible outcome that I said in that earlier thread: post 159.