It seems rather unlikely that this is one of the "shooting in the air" cases. Also the proposed remedies do not say anything about preventing people from shooting in the air.
I noticed that, too. You'd think something like giant fines and/or substantial jail sentences for reckless discharge would have more impact on the problem than this 1-5 blather. It suggests that they're interested in disarming the public, not preventing death or injury, doesn't it?