Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Apogee
I can not see how this would reduce, rather than increase, the tax collecting bureaucracy.

It seems that it would vastly increase the bureaucracy. Someone or some committee has to decide exactly what is "new" as opposed to "used" and how does "income" differ from "service." The current IRS and state tax guidelines could be expanded to do this.

65 posted on 09/28/2005 2:06:48 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Doctor Stochastic

"It seems that it would vastly increase the bureaucracy."

Let's see ... we would be reducing the complexity of the system by about 99% (as measured by the number of pages in the two systems) and reducing the number of points of collection/enforcement by more than 95%. And you are saying that it would take a drastically incresed bureaucracy to do that?

"Someone or some committee has to decide exactly what is 'new' as opposed to 'used' and how does 'income' differ from 'service.' The current IRS and state tax guidelines could be expanded to do this."

The definition of "new" under the FairTax is "never before taxed". The current IRS and state tax guidelines could not be "expanded", since they would have been repealed.


236 posted on 09/29/2005 5:14:56 AM PDT by phil_will1 (My posts are in no way limited or restricted by previously expressed SQL opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson