Skip to comments.
ABC, CBS Secretly Searching for Anchors
The Associated Press ^
| 9/26/05
| David Bauder
Posted on 09/27/2005 9:14:51 AM PDT by LdSentinal
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
To: LdSentinal
If they want ratings, they should go with Beetlejuice.
2
posted on
09/27/2005 9:15:46 AM PDT
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: LdSentinal
At the rate they are sinking, the last thing the MSM needs is more anchors.
3
posted on
09/27/2005 9:16:11 AM PDT
by
clee1
(We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
To: LdSentinal
Why? They haven't produced any that I would watch.
To: LdSentinal
If one of them were to hire Brit Hume away from Fox, AND make him the chief of their news division, I'd bet the ratings would more than double the other two networks.
To: LdSentinal
Many words signifying nothing. Who cares who becomes the next lamestream anchors? The blogs have shredded the news media's credibility to shreds and the so called "reporters" are digging their own graves day by day.
I haven't watched network news in years and know very few who do.
6
posted on
09/27/2005 9:18:53 AM PDT
by
sr4402
To: LdSentinal
I think CBS or ABC could demonstrate just how unbiased they are by chosing Howard Dean....
To: LdSentinal
Has anyone noticed that they're missing anchors? Perhaps they should save themselves the celebrity paychecks.
To: clee1
I was thinking...they don't need anchors, they need a bilge pump!
To: LdSentinal
Heck, I'll sit there and read someone elde's copy (i.e., do what Dan did) for 1/4 of what they were paying Rather.
10
posted on
09/27/2005 9:22:23 AM PDT
by
martin_fierro
(Randle-El is a freakin' IDIOT)
To: LdSentinal
Loosing share?
Try the truth!
11
posted on
09/27/2005 9:22:39 AM PDT
by
ChadGore
(VISUALIZE 62,041,268 Bush fans.)
To: LdSentinal
12
posted on
09/27/2005 9:23:53 AM PDT
by
Michael.SF.
('That was the gift the president gave us, the gift of happiness, of being together,' Cindy Sheehan")
To: LdSentinal
Anchors are what you sink to keep you from drifting away...............
13
posted on
09/27/2005 9:25:27 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(In life, you don't get what you deserve. You get what you settle for...........)
To: LdSentinal
To: LdSentinal
LOL. How about Andrea Thompson...?
15
posted on
09/27/2005 9:28:37 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: mewzilla
How about the old Battle Hag Helen Thomas
To: ravingnutter
I was thinking...they don't need anchors, they need a bilge pump!LOL! That's the line of the day, and so true.
17
posted on
09/27/2005 9:34:45 AM PDT
by
GaltMeister
(“All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.”)
To: LdSentinal
Networks Dither Over Choosing Between Tweedle Dum and Dee.
Nice new rattle still spoiled. News at 11.
18
posted on
09/27/2005 9:34:57 AM PDT
by
LexBaird
(tyrannosaurus Lex, unapologetic carnivore)
To: LdSentinal
Let's see - they've gone without anchors for months and the world hasn't ended. Maybe the anchor paradigm is dead?
19
posted on
09/27/2005 9:37:36 AM PDT
by
wideawake
(God bless our brave troops and their Commander-in-Chief)
To: LdSentinal
"Now hear this! All RMS Titanic deck stewards report to the forecastle for assignments in rearranging the deck chairs!"
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
