It won't survive the court challenge, but write your Senator and demand a no vote.
#####It won't survive the court challenge#####
That's what everyone said about McCain-Feingold. The 1st Amendment is now considered "optional" by some of our Supreme Court justices.
That's what Bush said about McCain-Fiengold.
What makes you think that? This kind of stuff clearly violates the Constitution, but it's been decades since the courts worried about that.
And I don't for a minute buy the excuse that this amendment was slipped in secretively. You don't even need to read a bill with "hate crimes" in its title to know what is going on.
Yeah, right! They said the same thing about "campaign finance reform", and "eminent domain" too. Guess what.....
"In a surprising move, the House of Representatives on September 14, 2005 approved The Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2005, HR2662, as an amendment to the Childrens Safety Act, HR3132. It was approved 223-199."
Do you really think the Senate won't pass this? You'll be wrong.
Do you really think that President Bush won't sign this? You'll be wrong.
Did you not see this coming? Then you were wrong all along.
I'm firing off a strongly worded objection to Boxer and Feinstein RIGHT NOW!!!
We said that about campaign finance reform.
Just where is this mythical court that would overturn this?