He cited the work as an example of how evolution proceeds by small changes. He's skeptical about it, but he cites it as evidence in support of his position?
I would say that Behe is an excellent scientist, who also has a firm grasp of the principles of logic.
You're entitled to your opinion, of course. Mine is, that if I'd written something as universally derided in the community of scientists as 'Darwin's Black Box', I'd go into selling pharmaceuticals on the internet under an assumed name. :-)
Have you actually read Behe's book?