Skip to comments.
Dispute over evolution goes on trial in U.S. court
Baltimore Sun ^
| September 26, 2005
| Arthur Hirsch
Posted on 09/26/2005 1:53:21 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 401-404 next last
To: Cincinatus' Wife
The ACLU and Americans United for Separation of Church and State once again - communism continues to try push God out of our society and culture and no doubt they will continue to win.
2
posted on
09/26/2005 2:49:01 AM PDT
by
mlc9852
To: Cincinatus' Wife
"While they do not reject all evolutionary theory, ID proponents argue that it incorrectly insists life took shape purely through a mindless process." I bet this thread is going to receive many, many mindless posts!!
3
posted on
09/26/2005 3:08:06 AM PDT
by
gobucks
(http://oncampus.richmond.edu/academics/classics/students/Ribeiro/Laocoon.htm)
To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
Trial starts today!
EvolutionPing |
A pro-evolution science list with over 300 names. See the list's explanation at my freeper homepage. Then FReepmail to be added or dropped. See what's new in The List-O-Links. |
|
|
|
4
posted on
09/26/2005 3:14:14 AM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Disclaimer -- this information may be legally false in Kansas.)
To: All
This trial is scheduled to start today.
Here's a link to the official website of the court where Kitzmiller, et al v. Dover School District, et al. is being tried. If you click on Docket, you get a list of all significant pleadings filed in the case -- the complaint, the answer, etc. They're PDF files, but almost everyone has the Adobe reader. So you can check that website and be fully up to date on the history of the case.
5
posted on
09/26/2005 3:18:18 AM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Disclaimer -- this information may be legally false in Kansas.)
To: PatrickHenry
I thought it was 2005, not 1925.
6
posted on
09/26/2005 3:19:35 AM PDT
by
WestVirginiaRebel
(The Democratic Party-Jackass symbol, jackass leaders, jackass supporters.)
To: All
7
posted on
09/26/2005 3:41:27 AM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Disclaimer -- this information may be legally false in Kansas.)
To: PatrickHenry
It's too bad Court TV hasn't got the brains to televise this..
Or is there some PA statute that prohibits televising the trial??
8
posted on
09/26/2005 4:21:21 AM PDT
by
Drammach
(Freedom; not just a job, it's an adventure..)
To: Cincinatus' Wife
There is a faction of us good folks on the right that is so incredibly blind and/or stupid as to cause the scumbags and Socialists on left, lead by the MSM, to paint everyone on the right with the same brush of the insipid.
The radical fundamentalists will kill the country's movement to the right quicker than anything.
9
posted on
09/26/2005 5:22:54 AM PDT
by
Vaquero
(" an armed society is a polite society" Robert Heinlein)
To: Vaquero
"The radical fundamentalists will kill the country's movement to the right quicker than anything."
Who exactly are these "radical fundamentalists" you accuse?
10
posted on
09/26/2005 5:26:22 AM PDT
by
mlc9852
To: Drammach
No cameras in federal courts....
11
posted on
09/26/2005 5:27:44 AM PDT
by
general_re
("Frantic orthodoxy is never rooted in faith, but in doubt." - Reinhold Niebuhr)
To: general_re
Thanks.. that answers it..
12
posted on
09/26/2005 5:33:47 AM PDT
by
Drammach
(Freedom; not just a job, it's an adventure..)
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Any London bookies laying out odds on this?
13
posted on
09/26/2005 5:36:14 AM PDT
by
ml1954
To: Cincinatus' Wife
"The lawsuit, brought by 11 parents in the Dover Area School District, attacks as unconstitutional the year-old policy of telling ninth-grade biology students that Charles Darwin's theory of evolution "is not a fact. Gaps in the Theory exist for which there is no evidence."
UNCONSTITUTIONAL?!?! The Constitution is for establishing and contolling the Federal government, not regulating education.
14
posted on
09/26/2005 5:36:17 AM PDT
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: Drammach
It's too bad Court TV hasn't got the brains to televise this.They tried. The court refused. It's one of the orders you can find at the "Docket" link I provided above.
15
posted on
09/26/2005 5:52:24 AM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Disclaimer -- this information may be legally false in Kansas.)
To: Cincinatus' Wife
"We object to the distinction between naturalism and supernaturalism."
A supposedly educated person actually made this statement. Amazing.
16
posted on
09/26/2005 5:57:52 AM PDT
by
ml1954
To: Cincinatus' Wife
First, I'm a firm believer in Genesis' account of God's creation. Second, I'm not trying to start any fights on this (though these threads usually end up that way). With that out of the way, I must pose this question to FR's Darwinists:
Though not a direct reflection on the "science" of the case, does it not bother you that your "side" of this issue is headed by "the American Civil Liberties Union and Americans United for Separation of Church and State"?
Personally, I cannot imagine too many other groups I would want on my side less.
Flame away! ...or better yet, answer my question.
17
posted on
09/26/2005 6:20:47 AM PDT
by
DesertSapper
(I Love God, Family, Country! (and dead terrorists))
To: mlc9852
This is one of the few instances where I'm behind the ACLU. They are trying to preserve the remnants of science education in high school. This ID nonsense is polluting the science classes and requires more 'dumbing down' of other science classes to make the statement fit. Inserting ID into school by rule of School Board is intellectual affermative action.
18
posted on
09/26/2005 6:29:26 AM PDT
by
doc30
(Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
To: mlc9852
the students of the scribblings of the desert wandering, sandal wearing, Bronze age goat herders (or fishermen if you prefer), try to explain to empirically trained people of science how their theories are faulty.
19
posted on
09/26/2005 6:29:54 AM PDT
by
Vaquero
(" an armed society is a polite society" Robert Heinlein)
To: WestVirginiaRebel
Some people want to turn the clock back to before 1925.
20
posted on
09/26/2005 6:30:06 AM PDT
by
doc30
(Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 401-404 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson