Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: manwiththehands
To follow up:

Line Item Veto

From the link:
"On June 26, 1998, the Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, struck down the line-item veto law, declaring it unconstitutional. In the case of Clinton v. City of New York, the Court held the law unconstitutional on grounds that it violates the presentment clause; in order to grant the President line item veto a constitutional amendment is needed (according to the majority opinion)."

12 posted on 09/21/2005 6:09:44 AM PDT by whd23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: whd23

I didn't know the line item veto was struck down. Must have missed it. Without a line-item veto the bully pulpit is all W has ... and he's not very good at being a bully with the 'Rats, let alone his own party.


15 posted on 09/21/2005 6:17:04 AM PDT by manwiththehands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson