Posted on 09/18/2005 5:32:11 AM PDT by Mia T
thx for the suggestion ping
ping
ping
ping
What's that you say? They were never punished for those "contacts"............
Great title. Great work. Thanks.
WRITTEN IN STONE: AN ARCHITECT DEFINES THE CLINTONS
by Mia T, 12-30-02
Whereas a huckster removes meaning from institutions--the wife picked up where the husband left off--an architect encodes meaning in buildings. James S. Polshek, the architect with the dubious distinction of having been commissioned to build the William J. Clinton Presidential Center in Little Rock, Arkansas, believes that a successful architectural solution must necessarily be rooted in relevance. Just as Polshek's buildings have physical layers, so too do they have layers of meaning. His Rose Center for Earth and Space, for example, is informed formally and programmatically by the historic architecture of a designated landmark even as it redefines itself, (often too self-consciously, in my view), in Star-Trekian terms. Reduced to its essence, the building is the nascent universe before the Big Bang, the promise of the undifferentiated cell in its mother's womb. The "bridge to the 21st century" was, perhaps, clinton's most delusional conceit, so it is not surprising that it would become clinton's self-referential metaphor of choice. His library was to be that bridge, if he had anything to say about it...
The architect is often the master of the inside joke, witness Robert Venturi's postmodern chairs. Venturi exploited--unabashedly and with abandon--the vocabulary of Las Vegas, its stage-set-as-reality and its roadside culture--bright, clashing, ugly and fake. The architect's inside joke is his hedge against the sycophancy that comes with patronage. The flip side of the encoded meaning of the architect is the terrorist's decoding of it. To bin Laden, the World Trade Center was Jewish capitalism encoded in urban space. If Polshek's vision of clinton's library is a bridge, the inside joke is that, at best, it is a bridge to nowhere. More likely, it is a bridge to the 7th century...or a doublewide to house clinton double-speak. Take your choice. copyright Mia T 2002, 2005 |
Without a doubt: Clinton is the greatest con-man the world has ever known.
He makes P.T. Barnum look like a piker.
What used car salesman wouldnt want him for a son?.
Why doesn't he depend on his beloved Social Security for his retirement living?
Perfect work, Thank You!
thx :)
thanx :)
and the discussion.
Resolve to give a million dollars for the children? Here we go again, same ol Clinton same ol rhetoric. Children who are taught to be terrorists daily? Gaza a terrorist state now run by the sons of Arafat . Will we never learn.
(An orgy of looting and arson)
By MATTHEW GUTMAN
[snip]For years, Palestinian sovereignty seemed only a dune away; the logic being that were it not for the settlers and their stranglehold on the Gaza Strip, the Palestinians could navigate toward a new future.
Meanwhile these peaceful Palestinians even burned the extensive green houses used for agriculture/food, they had been left as a gift and these wasteful people destroyed them and of course will look to the largess of others to rebuild them and look to others to feed them. Welfare and warfare is the only thing they know.
UNBELIEVABLE!!! clinton is suppost to be raising monies for the floor victims, Americans if you wish, and here he is raising money for a cause named after himself....
Can you think of anyone more selfish than the clintons???? well maybe those that donated to this wasteless cause....
|
||||||||||
|
Fellating Kids and clinton Degeneracy: The Revisionism Begins "Be Liberal, Live in Ignorance and Servitude" Liberals have always had problems figuring out causation. They believe for example that because people who smoke (sometimes) have higher rates of cancer than people who don't that smoking CAUSES cancer, worse, they believe that if people get cancer it is the fault of the "tobacco companies" (i.e., caused by the manufactures of tobacco products). They further believe that the remedy for this fault is that billions of dollars in "damages" should be transferred from the wealth of stockholders in tobacco companies to a handful of plaintiffs lawyers including the First Lady's relatives and others closely associated with the Democratic party. And they believe, apparently, that if young people are now experimenting with sex at early ages and with more profoundly explicit practices than in past years, and that if the President of the United States decides to enroll a young intern in rendition of such services to his middle aged libido resultantly staining both her dress and America's reputation, that a spontaneous wave of teenage sex experimentation, sucked (sorry) the poor middle aged chief executive into its vortex. Deducing causation in most events takes deliberate, focused, thought, insight, and a disciplined intelligence that doesnt skip foundational indoctrination (aka actually studying in school). Causation of the diseases associated with cancer is highly complex and to a large degree still unknown. That smoking is probably not healthy for you is well known. That a middle aged chief executive, Yale Law School graduate, former professor of Constitutional Law and State Attorney General should be responsible and accountable for his own actions including HIS perjury and obstruction of justice would seem axiomatic to all but a liberal who has the capacity to adopt causationally convenient theories based solely on tangential proximity to the event under examination rather than through any rational analysis of the importance or significance of the asserted cause to the event. Thus, "guns" are used in some murders therefore, to a liberal all "guns" should be either banned or kept in locked safes with trigger locks so as to disarm the law abiding public and eviscerate their legally recognized right to effective self defense. Quite simply, one has to be pretty stupid or very corrupt or both to be a liberal, at least and for sure to be a Clinton supporter. But it is worse than that, one also has to deny the importance of human consciousness and free will. That is, a Clinton defending liberal apparently believes that childhood psychic trauma, teenage sex trends (remarkably and largely only rampant among the social classes targeted by liberals for social intervention for the past 40 years) and the power of "addiction" which used to be considered merely "habituation" in more stalwart times, are more significant than free will in determining human conduct.
by Gail Wynand
Interview with O'Reily and Lucinda Frank with the clinton being the subject
TALKING ABOUT BILL CLINTON
FRANKS: I think you're wrong because, after about two years of -- of working on this, you know, on and off, I think the president -- that the teenage culture caused the president's behavior in the way he behaved in -- with the oral sex.
O'REILLY: I think you're crazy, Ms. Franks, with all due respect.
FRANKS: OK. Well...
O'REILLY: I think that's one of the most -- one of the most insane statements I've ever heard.
FRANKS: Well, let me -- let me explain to you....
O'REILLY: You're telling me that teenage behavior affected the way President Clinton went about his business with Monica Lewinsky?
FRANKS: Because Monica Lewinsky was almost just out of teenager -- and she said, "Let me give oral sex to you," no big thing...
________________________________________________________
The only statement that is true in Lucinda Frank's article is that Monica was just past being a teen-ager. Just a few years older than bill and hillary clinton's own daughter, Chelsea.
Any man or woman is so depraved, perverted, to use a young girl so abusively then allow others to make excuses for their actions - until they themselves believe it was 'some others fault'.
But then that is the story of bill and hillary clinton --- someone else made me do it!!! And they are right. The media, the MSN, MSM, broadcast news, cable news - whatever, has allowed these two to continue to corrupt.
As the MSM continues to go after President Bush on college drinking, daughters drinking, Rove, Haliburton, Iraq, now it is Katrina.
Makes me wonder what a couple of dad's think about the clintons. Daddy Bush for the crap his son has to take from clinton and the msn, as he travel with the clown. AND Monica's family for what has become of their daughter.
Its enough to make Kofi Annan very jealous!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.