Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Antoninus

I am disgusted that Mike Fitzpatrick voted for this piece of shiat legislation. He took a lot of heat in his campaign for being pro-life and pro-family, and was supposedly "too conservatuve" for this district. His special election opponent just dropped out of the 2004 race and the remaining Democrats are unknowns. Why did he think he needed to vote for this? It's not like there are hundreds of hate crimes against homos happening in Bucks County! And the homos around here aren't going to vote for him anyway. Jeeeeeez.


38 posted on 09/15/2005 8:19:22 AM PDT by Dems_R_Losers (2,4,6,8 - a burka makes me look overweight!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dems_R_Losers
I am disgusted that Mike Fitzpatrick voted for this piece of shiat legislation. He took a lot of heat in his campaign for being pro-life and pro-family, and was supposedly "too conservatuve" for this district.

The proof is in the pudding. And if nothing, this proves that Fitzpatrick is NOT family friendly.

This seat may go Dem in 2006 because of this vote. Fitzpatrick DESPERATELY needs a primary challenge.
40 posted on 09/15/2005 8:23:55 AM PDT by Antoninus (Dominus Iesus, miserere nobis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson