To: Just mythoughts
Great post, great read, as a gardener I hate weeds myself, more than the unwelcome pests of all sizes. Weeds can transform a landscape like nothing else. One of the consequences of labor mobility in our society is that new landowners are unfamiliar with local habitat and can't see the change. Teaching them can be maddening.
I am in the mid-west, is your book relevant to all landowners.
The book relies upon a local case, simply because without that you can't see the evil games played by the local bureaucrats and activists in enough detail to be useful to you. So although it talks about timber, it does template onto any resource management situation. Its discussions of TMDLs and endangered specious, for example, will raise knowing grins. Learning how comical this garbage really is will help empower you in public discourse.
31 posted on
09/07/2005 6:51:25 AM PDT by
Carry_Okie
(The environment is too complex and too important to manage by central planning.)
To: Carry_Okie
Thank you.
Your interview supplied many a sad grin. Our mere 3 acres was rural enough yet considered civilized when we the bank and the county took possession. The continuous problem I encounter is the weed seeds continuous blowing from the neighborhood, all are 3 + acre lots. Every time a lawn mower gets moving I see the results landing atop my above ground pool.
Land ownership is indeed very labor intensive, which is one of the reasons I think the trend is in huge houses place upon very tiny lots.
Sadly from my experience involving land management one never knows who exactly they are dealing with until the agreement gets published as legal decree. Conservatives sometimes only see "capitalism" the dollars, as a sign of progress, and fail to see the small print, which isn't capitalism at all.
I do appreciate your hard work and good mind.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson