Uhhh. NO. He's not saying what you're interpreting at all. He's saying just the opposite which would border on an act of war.
He's probably suggesting that, by knowing the right people, a couple of folks could have gotten "official" passes to enter NO
What part of "ignoring American orders" didn't you understand?
Well, let's turn this around. Suppose a US diplomat sprouted a pair (fat chance) and went into a disaster area in a foreign country to rescue US citizens. Would you be for or against it?
Oh, I understand all of it. He's talking about ignoring the rules made for the masses and getting through the checkpoints with passes procured by "friends," not about some wild-ass invasion. But if you'd like the indulge yourself in your fantasy, be my guest.