Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Get Off His Back (Updated)[Must Read- Ben Stein]
The American Prowler ^ | 9/2/2005 | Ben Stein

Posted on 09/04/2005 10:27:00 PM PDT by nickcarraway

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last
To: nickcarraway

ben stein for fed chair!


21 posted on 09/04/2005 10:48:04 PM PDT by chrispycsuf (our troops need our support now more than ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Hello Free Republic:

I'm going to climb out on a limb here. Been lurking for a couple years, posted a few one liners here and there - but now I'm really, well I'm pretty darn upset, and I've moved beyond the one liners just now.

I just had one of those thoughts; the sort which start and materialize into something comprehensive as soon as they start - like a sudden vision of clarity - which I posted on another forum basically to inflame and irritate the liberals there. :) It has to do with the current (whining) about how fast, or not so fast, some quantity of conspicuously camoflage-bearing people in rotary wing aircraft were available for television cameras to focus on for their viewers.

Now it's probably a good time for me to confess to never having been in the government's employ, nor having access to any inside information of any sort - which of course means I can just go ahead and vent. So here goes:

The current opportunity, as far as a federal response to Hurricane Katrina, seems to have centered on how (let's be honest, slowly) the response seemed to have been. So here's this lifetime civilian's proposal:

A new branch of the American military, reporting directly to DHS, with a standing 15,000 troop strength - equipped and deployed 24/7/365 evenly along all our borders, to augment and assist the Border Patrol.

Three shifts of 5,000 deployed evenly around the country with vehicles and various logistical support. On the Canadian border, the Pacific coast, the Rio Grande, all along the Atlantic seaboard from Louisiana to Maine, in Juneau, even Maui. On duty keeping an eye on things, ever vigilant, protecting our borders when things are ok.

No portion of America, more than 500 miles from available, instantly deployable response and support.

The .01% of the time when something terrible happens - they literally drop everything and jump in the Humvees with 2 hours notice. Anywhere! Worst case - troops rolling into the hot zone on average FIVE HOURS after their "go" command, then increasing troop and equipment level steadily - as the remainder of the reaction force deploys in place immediately, as it arrives.

Our borders will still be protected, since the Border Patrol has the primary responsibility and will keep that job - they'll stay right where they are.

The beauty of the new service? They'll always be training and ready to roll.

Now please feel free to point out the idiocy of the idea. :) Don't worry, I'm not easily offended.


22 posted on 09/04/2005 10:48:32 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Bump!


23 posted on 09/04/2005 10:48:49 PM PDT by Spunky ("Everyone has a freedom of choice, but not of consequences.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nk_47

Bless you Ben Stein


24 posted on 09/04/2005 10:50:36 PM PDT by MEG33 (GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

i like it...i like it...i like it


25 posted on 09/04/2005 10:50:38 PM PDT by chrispycsuf (our troops need our support now more than ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: chrispycsuf

Thats a damn good choice Chrispy if I may say so.


26 posted on 09/04/2005 10:51:15 PM PDT by guitarnick40 (When a liberal is in doubt, all they do is scream and shout.... "it's Bush's fault")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Yeah the libs are attempting to fill usenet with their lies. Time for our facts to hit their posts of lies

http://jednet207.tripod.com/PoliticalNewsGroups-PC.html


27 posted on 09/04/2005 10:55:04 PM PDT by MaineVoter2002 (http://jednet207.tripod.com/PoliticalLinks.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
The current opportunity, as far as a federal response to Hurricane Katrina, seems to have centered on how (let's be honest, slowly) the response seemed to have been.

One big correction - It was the state governments call. The feds can't come in without the states OK. It's a states rights issue. The state has control over FEMA until power is handed over to the feds voluntarily. Bush finally met with the mayor, and then the feds took over and things started to move.

28 posted on 09/04/2005 10:56:04 PM PDT by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

You are right. It IS a "MUST READ".

Ben Stein is pointing out the obvious facts and truth.

It is shameful that the MSM and Democrats were trying to use even this disaster to attack President Bush.


29 posted on 09/04/2005 11:05:55 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
"It was the state governments call. The feds can't come in without the states OK"

Exactly, and yet Bush requested permission for the feds to take over prior to the 'cane and was rebuffed by Governor BooHoo. Libs & Dems don't understand the laws of the land and never did.(unless their breaking them that is)

30 posted on 09/04/2005 11:05:57 PM PDT by guitarnick40 (When a liberal is in doubt, all they do is scream and shout.... "it's Bush's fault")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
I thought that FEMA stood for federal emergency MANAGEMENT agency... disasters of this kind require the collective resources of the country. The fact is that, despite the administration's own targetting of NO's levees being 1 of 3 top nat'l sec. priorities in 2001, funding to complete levee renovation was cut. It probably doesn't help that 1/3 of the LA NG is in Iraq (along with their high water vehicles - why, when they're in the desert, is beyond me). And why was FEMA turning down offers of transportation, water and supplies before the the hurricane hit? Who is in charge there?

This admin. seemed peculiarly oblivious when it comes to shoring up defense here. They seem to have disappeared on the issue of illegal immigration (bizarro world where Hitlery makes more sense on an issue than the current WH), seem to have no interest in securing nuclear or chemical plants, and hey, what's it matter to them that 1/4 of the oil we consume comes through the port of NO? Their oil buddies seem not to be hurting...

We'd be rightfully screaming if this were WJC. If I were the WH scheduler I probably would not have GWB out golfing or visibly fundraising this week. And, for god's sake, sending out Clinton (the lesser) to get quality face time in front of the cameras with Poppy? What are they thinking??

We weren't responsible for the 911 attack either, but the feds acted quickly to pull NYC through... we had 4 years, the levees could have failed just as easily with a judicious terrorist bomb; the hurricane's full force bypassed NO. Where has all that money gone?

Bush should fire the heads of FEMA and DHS, instead of letting a bunch of media pundits make him look weak spouting lame excuses...

31 posted on 09/04/2005 11:09:13 PM PDT by podkane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: konaice
I second it.

Ben Stein in 2008!

It would be nice to have a non-politician in office, one who is also quite smart.

32 posted on 09/04/2005 11:12:23 PM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Beautiful.

"When the city government simply ignores its own sick and hospitalized and elderly people in its evacuation order, is Mr. Bush to blame for that? "

I would love to see a reporter interrupt one Mayor Nagin's idiotic, profanity-laced, buck-passing tirades with this question.


33 posted on 09/04/2005 11:15:36 PM PDT by SerpentDove (In the shadow of the Almighty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nk_47

DITTO


34 posted on 09/04/2005 11:23:11 PM PDT by lainde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Right Brother
"Al Sharpton is no more a reverand than Helen Thomas is a swimsuit model"

PLEASE,NO PICTURES !!!!

35 posted on 09/04/2005 11:23:26 PM PDT by smoothsailing (Liberals are like blisters,they always show up after the hard work is done)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: podkane
Somebody's been spending too much time at DU...

we had 4 years, the levees could have failed just as easily with a judicious terrorist bomb; the hurricane's full force bypassed NO. Where has all that money gone?

You are wrong about the bomb comment. It would have taken an absolutely huge bomb to take out that much levee, more than could be driven in with a semi. Prior to the storm the Levees were well below the top of the earthen dike, not like you see them today, right up to the concrete wall.

You can't build Levees in 4 years, you can't even get the EIS done in 4 years.

The decision to build levees to defend against a Cat3 hurricane and NOT a Cat5 were local/state/federal decisions, made over 50 years by successive administrations at all levels of government.

The money went toward paying for all the Wellfare queens under the Johnson Ford Carter Clinton administrations.

You want to blame someone, blame the Mayor. He had the responsibility to Evacuate his city. The left over 500 busess parked on the weekend of the storm. Blame the Governor, she failed to declare an emergency untill the day before the storm hit.

You need to do a little better research, and a little less swollowing the MSM hook line and sinker.

36 posted on 09/04/2005 11:24:51 PM PDT by konaice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
No portion of America, more than 500 miles from available, instantly deployable response and support.

The .01% of the time when something terrible happens - they literally drop everything and jump in the Humvees with 2 hours notice. Anywhere! Worst case - troops rolling into the hot zone on average FIVE HOURS after their "go"

You must think the United States is the size Florida or something.

Do you have any idea how many sets of duplicate "Humvees" you would need to keep a set 500 miles from anywhere? Dude: Do the math. You can't even get to the humvees 500 miles away in two hours.

But just in case you missed it, we already have this force in every state, with a headquarters in every large (and most of the medium sized) cities. Its called the National Gaurd.

And it does a tremendous job.

The failurs of N.O. were Local problems of a corrupt democratic government that did not follow its own disaster plan.

Lurk for another couple years please.

37 posted on 09/04/2005 11:33:43 PM PDT by konaice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

Comment #38 Removed by Moderator

To: konaice

Does the National Guard report to DHS, and is it deployable at a moment's notice solely on the judgement of the CIC?

Does the NG help secure the borders?

(pretty fair flame about lurking though, will admit)

:)


39 posted on 09/04/2005 11:41:27 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
Does the National Guard report to DHS, and is it deployable at a moment's notice solely on the judgement of the CIC?

Does the NG help secure the borders?

Better yet, the National Guard is IMMEDIATLY available to the Governor, without even waiting for Washington's approval.

The National Guard is at the disposal of DHS at the Presidents direction, as the President can also deploy the guard as needed. (Although I would feel much better having the DOD managing the guard than the political hacks over at DHS. Any organization that thinks they provide safety by strip searching old ladies and putting 1 year old babies on the No Fly List does not strike me as a serious organization).

40 posted on 09/04/2005 11:47:16 PM PDT by konaice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson