Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rebuilding New Orleans doesn't make sense
New Orleans Times-Picayune ^ | 9/1/05 | Bill Walsh

Posted on 09/01/2005 3:41:16 PM PDT by FormerACLUmember

House Speaker Dennis Hastert dropped a bombshell on flood-ravaged New Orleans on Thursday by suggesting that it isn’t sensible to rebuild the city. "It doesn't make sense to me," Hastert told the Daily Herald in suburban Chicago in editions published today. "And it's a question that certainly we should ask." Hastert's comments came as Congress cut short its summer recess and raced back to Washington to take up an emergency aid package expected to be $10 billion or more.

Hastert said that he supports an emergency bailout, but raised questions about a long-term rebuilding effort. As the most powerful voice in the Republican-controlled House, Hastert is in a position to block any legislation that he opposes. "We help replace, we help relieve disaster," Hastert said. "But I think federal insurance and everything that goes along with it... we ought to take a second look at that."

Rebuilding the city, which is more than 80 percent submerged, could cost tens of billions of dollars more, experts projected. Hastert questioned the wisdom of rebuilding a city below sea level that will continue to be in the path of powerful hurricanes. "You know we build Los Angeles and San Francisco on top of earthquake issures and they rebuild, too. Stubbornness," he said. Hastert wasn't the only one questioning the rebuilding of New Orleans. The Waterbury, Conn., Republican-American newspaper wrote an editorial Wednesday entitled, "Is New Orleans worth reclaiming?" "Americans' hearts go out to the people in Katrina's path," it said. "But if the people of New Orleans and other low-lying areas insist on living in harm's way, they ought to accept responsibility for what happens to them and their property."

(Excerpt) Read more at nola.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; hastert; katrina; neworleans; neworleansdebate; rebuildneworleans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-187 next last
Do we rebuild this entire well below sea level entire city so that the next hurricane does exactly the same thing? Or do we protect just the industrial, commerical, tourist and entertainment downtown, behind huge new levees and resettle the now homeless populace into new homes on dry land?


1 posted on 09/01/2005 3:41:18 PM PDT by FormerACLUmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember

There are some with a few brains.


2 posted on 09/01/2005 3:45:09 PM PDT by Snoopers-868th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember

Everybody knew that this was not an "if a disaster would happen", but a situation of when a disaster would happen.


3 posted on 09/01/2005 3:45:24 PM PDT by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember

I think Disney should Buy it and turn it into a water park


4 posted on 09/01/2005 3:45:37 PM PDT by al baby (Father of the beeber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember

They should ponder what would be the answer the wake of a nuclear disaster or attack. A difficult decision to "walk away" but some places are not inhabitable...

The city has stood for centuries. What sort of history is there with flooding? I know that the levees/flood control are not comparable.


5 posted on 09/01/2005 3:46:33 PM PDT by weegee (The Rovebaiting by DUAC must stop. It is nothing but a partisan witchhunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember

Hastert is absolutely right. I don't want one penny of my tax money wasted on rebuilding another disaster in the making. And disaster won't require a hurricane. Any half-witted al-Qaeda zealot can figure out that all that's needed to decimate this city again after it's rebuilt, is to fly a Piper Cub into a levee.


6 posted on 09/01/2005 3:46:59 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember


I have to agree with a FoxNews commentator on Cavuto`s show.His name escapes me but he simply stated,'Rebuild it once at taxpayers expense,then after that you`ve been warned.Expect to rely on insurance if you wish to live in Hurricane alley'.


7 posted on 09/01/2005 3:47:02 PM PDT by Para-Ord.45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane

This very issue was discussed in depth on FR one year ago.


8 posted on 09/01/2005 3:47:37 PM PDT by FormerACLUmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dane

Who's going to catch the flak when "the big one" (earthquake) finally hits California and catches millions without insurance?


9 posted on 09/01/2005 3:49:23 PM PDT by weegee (The Rovebaiting by DUAC must stop. It is nothing but a partisan witchhunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember
In parts of the world where floods occur on land that is above river or sea level, the flood waters usually cause a lot of superficial damage but not much structural damage because the waters recede quickly (24-48 hours) due to gravity drainage. New Orleans’ buildings are going to soak in water for weeks. This is likely to cause such excessive structural damage that all the flooded buildings will have to be demolished. That would perhaps be 80% of the city. There seems little point in demolishing 80% of a city that is below sea level to rebuild it.
10 posted on 09/01/2005 3:51:14 PM PDT by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trout-Mouth

I have a question-

If and when they do get the levee plugged, where are they going to pump all that NASTY, POLLUTED water to?

Back into the lake?


11 posted on 09/01/2005 3:52:11 PM PDT by Muzzle_em (I'm an island awash in a sea of stupidity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember
There is only one long term fix for New Orleans and it is a damn expensive prospect. That would be to bring in enough fill dirt to build the city 6' above sea level. Look at the picture, in some places that would require 24 vertical feet of dirt, a huge project running into Billions of dollars. Not to mention the legal entanglements, etc.

Anything else, will just be another set of temporary measures but I fear that is exactly what will be done.
12 posted on 09/01/2005 3:53:33 PM PDT by taxcontrol (People are entitled to their opinion - no matter how wrong it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee

What a frightening scenario...I don't even what to think about it! One catastrophe at a time plezzzzzzz sweet Jesus! God Help us the day mother nature decides to stretch her legs in Cali! YIKES!


13 posted on 09/01/2005 3:53:44 PM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember

Why spend money for a bunch of looters?


14 posted on 09/01/2005 3:53:45 PM PDT by Archidamus (We are wise because we are not so highly educated as to look down on our laws and customs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember

Something is going to be rebuilt -- for political reasons if nothing else. Any government that simply writes off New Orleans entirely loses Louisiana's votes for years to come. The likelier questions are what will be rebuilt, how much of the city and its surroundings, how, and where. The area is bound to look different in the future, but Congress is going to give Louisiana something to sugar the bitter pill.


15 posted on 09/01/2005 3:53:56 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: FormerACLUmember

They are in the process of being resettled in Houston right now. They are going to get tired of sitting in the Dome for six months.


17 posted on 09/01/2005 3:54:59 PM PDT by Archidamus (We are wise because we are not so highly educated as to look down on our laws and customs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember
From the looks of things, they need to turn it into a penal colony. Is Snake Blitzen busy?
18 posted on 09/01/2005 3:55:33 PM PDT by msnimje
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius; Clemenza

I think Hastert and our FReeper Clemenza are right, between them. Clemenza suggested just keeping the Quarter and the Garden District, and rebuilding the rest elsewhere.

I think that's a great idea. Conserve the scenic part as a sort of park/casino/rec area, and create a new city on more stable and higher ground. This could be a chance for our architects and builders to really shine. DC was a planned city (well, not the slum part), and I think the new NO could be a real gem of a city if we got some good, creative architects and planners into this.


19 posted on 09/01/2005 3:56:09 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Muzzle_em

Yes, but they will screen out the bodies.


20 posted on 09/01/2005 3:57:00 PM PDT by Archidamus (We are wise because we are not so highly educated as to look down on our laws and customs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-187 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson