It bears reminding that the democrats have endured a great deal lately.
Notice - not one mention of their greatest president ever - *Billy Jeff Rodham Clinton...
To: Libloather
Democrats regroup by throwing a ritzy Hollywood, red carpet party, followed by seminars by media moguls the next day. The 2-3 days are filled with strategy sessions, meet and greets, and cocktail parties.
2 posted on
08/29/2005 6:37:08 PM PDT by
coconutt2000
(NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
To: Libloather
Colleges should stick to education, and stop all the indoctrination..
3 posted on
08/29/2005 6:39:48 PM PDT by
xcamel
(Deep Red, stuck in a "bleu" state.)
To: Libloather
The Democrats can win in 08 if they follow the following:
1) Dump Hillary
2) Dump Gun Control
3) Come up with a Health Care program that isn't just a big power/cash grab
4) Run someone who is from south of the Mason/Dixon
I Predict they will fail on 3 out of the 4 points........
To: Libloather
Sounds like a job for the Irreverent Jessie Jackson.
6 posted on
08/29/2005 6:50:12 PM PDT by
Jaysun
(Democrats: We must become more effective at fooling people.)
To: Libloather
I thought it was the Whigs who lost to Bush. Maybe I'm getting those two parties confused.
7 posted on
08/29/2005 6:55:21 PM PDT by
gitmo
(Thanks, Mel. I needed that.)
To: Libloather
...formerly reputable party ???
When? When they were standing in the doorways of schoolhouses so black children couldn't get in? When they were arm-in-arm with the Communists? When they were allied with the Viet Cong?
I must have missed the "reputable" part, can we see some of that in my lifetime please?
8 posted on
08/29/2005 6:56:42 PM PDT by
thoughtomator
(Gentlemen may cry, "Peace! Peace!" -- but there is no peace. - Patrick Henry)
To: Libloather
Why they lose: ... "Its no real surprise that their current run of bad luck ... "
Blame it on Bush ... or "bad luck". Democrats lose because they are the party of "victims".
11 posted on
08/29/2005 7:09:35 PM PDT by
manwiththehands
(If the Left offends you, stick around. They're just getting started.)
To: Libloather
Why do so many people still insist that Dean's scream cost him his bid for president? Do they think that people are really that shallow? Dean lost the primaries because he was a nutcase and he kept putting his foot in his mouth. And incidentally, he finished third in the Iowa caucuses before he delivered his supposed "Campaign-Killing Scream".
To: Libloather
It seems now the typical apolitical American places the Democratic Party in nearly equal status with disparaging terms such as left-wing liberal, extremist or otherwise. This perception polarizes them as possessing principles and plans for the nation that are far removed from that of the typical voter. Happens to be true, Mr. Baer.
To: Libloather
Howard Dean, the one-time 2004 front-runner whose overzealous yell in Iowa bafflingly served to sink his campaign. Message to the media: there wasn't anything "baffling" about it. The MSM finally realized Dean was too kooky to beat GW Bush, so they used "The Scream" as an excuse to turn on Dean and bury him. Dean's campaign manager, Joe Trippi, even said this was the case. Oh, the MSM loved Dean's politics, they just hated GW Bush more.
They thought by trumpeting the "moderate war hero" Kerry they could sell this bag of goods to the American people. The problem was, Kerry was neither a war hero, nor was he moderate.
14 posted on
08/29/2005 7:22:40 PM PDT by
SkyPilot
To: Libloather
It seems now the typical apolitical American places the Democratic Party in nearly equal status with disparaging terms such as left-wing liberal, extremist or otherwise.Oh, I can be much more imaginative.
15 posted on
08/29/2005 7:27:09 PM PDT by
JoJo Gunn
(Help control the Leftist population. Have them spayed or neutered. ©)
To: Libloather
they are constantly under pressure from division in their own ranks over issues as varied as stem cell research and finding an agreeable exit strategy for the Iraq war.I notice he left out abortion, I guess all the Pro-life folks have left the RATs, so everyone left is pro-abortion.
He didn't mention gun-control either, I wonder what page they all seem to be on...........oh, that's right, gun control cost them the 2000 election, so they must be all on the same page as most Americans now, AGAINST gun control.
Tax cuts, no mention of tax cuts, wonder where they are on tax cuts..................
National Security..............hmm, yes that's right, they are together on that, can't have a War on Terror, might end up with prisoners with panties on their heads.........
Otherwise, they are on the path to winning! Like they did recently, ya know, getting 47% of the vote type winning.
17 posted on
08/29/2005 7:43:18 PM PDT by
Balding_Eagle
(God has blessed Republicans with really stupid enemies.)
To: Libloather
Just when you thought this country has had enough with al gore whining in 2000, they send out the ditch witch to whine like a stuck pig on national TV.
19 posted on
08/29/2005 7:58:22 PM PDT by
ChadGore
(VISUALIZE 62,041,268 Bush fans.)
To: Libloather
20 posted on
08/29/2005 8:06:34 PM PDT by
BJungNan
To: Libloather
Many are starting to wonder aloud: When will the democrats start to move closer towards an equal status with the dominant republicans?Personally, I'm satisfied to see the Democrats remain a group of annoying yip dogs for the foreseeable future.
24 posted on
08/29/2005 8:22:01 PM PDT by
exDemMom
(Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
To: Libloather
The democrats are getting their ass kicked for one simple reason: *THE DOGS DON'T LIKE THE FOOD.
* From an old story that still works well.
28 posted on
08/30/2005 5:28:44 AM PDT by
jmaroneps37
(The quisling ratmedia: always eager to remind us of why we hate them.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson