Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tom McClintock on the propositions (CA special election)
Tom McClintock ^ | 8/24/2005 | Tom McClintock

Posted on 08/24/2005 7:19:28 PM PDT by calif_reaganite

I've been getting calls about the various ballot propositions for the Special Election.

Here's how I see them:

Proposition 73: Parental Notification for Abortion. If parental consent is required for a child to use a tanning booth or get her ears pierced, shouldn’t parents at least be notified if she’s getting an abortion? YES. Whether you’re pro-life or pro-choice, this should be the all-time no-brainer.

Proposition 74: Teacher Tenure. Do parents have a right to expect a higher level of competence before a teacher is granted life-time tenure? YES. This modest measure simply increases the teacher probation period from two years to five years.

Proposition 75: Public Employee Union Dues. Should public employees decide for themselves which candidates they will support with their own money? YES. This measure requires that before a public employee union can take money from that employee for political donations, it has to get the employee’s permission.

Proposition 76: State Spending. Should government live within its means? YES. This measure restores the authority that the governor of California had between 1939 and 1983 to make mid-year spending cuts whenever spending outpaces revenue without having to return to the legislature.

Proposition 77: Re-districting. Should voters choose their representatives in legislative districts that are drawn without regard to partisan advantage? YES. The most obvious conflict of interest in government is when politicians choose which voters will get to vote for them by drawing their own legislative district lines. This measure puts a stop to it.

Propositions 78 and 79: Prescription drug discounts. Do you want the same people who run the DMV to run your pharmacy? NO. These are rival measures, one supported by drug companies and the other by liberal activists – both of which purport to lower drug prices. What they really do is assure that one group of patients gets to pay higher prices to provide subsidized prices for others. There’s no such thing as a free Levitra.

Proposition 80. Electricity Regulation. Do you want the same people who run the DMV to run your electricity company? NO. This measure locks in monopoly control of your electricity by the bureaucratized utilities and forbids you from ever being able to shop around for the lowest-priced electricity available.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: arnold; calinitiatives; calreform; election; governor; mcclintock; prop73; prop74; prop75; prop76; prop77; prop78; prop79; prop80; proposition; reform; schwarzenegger; special; unions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 08/24/2005 7:19:30 PM PDT by calif_reaganite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: calif_reaganite

I wish McClintock would initiate a lawsuit against the feds to get some of the NINE BILLION DOLLARS a year the federal government owes the state of CA for allowing the illegals to stay here!!!

and RINOld needs to call out the CA National Guard and place them on the border for pete sakes!!!


2 posted on 08/24/2005 7:30:43 PM PDT by kellynla (U.S.M.C. 1st Battalion,5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calif_reaganite; All
Hmm, what do you know. As an occasional critic, I can't fault Tom this time 'round. I agree with his picks.

If you haven't yet, order your California Border Patrol petition online.

I heard Arnold on 'The Roger Hedgecock Show' this afternoon. He brought up the parental notification prop himself and said paycheck protection was a good idea.

He's focused on pushing his 3 reforms for now but as it gets closer to election time he said he'll endorse other props.

3 posted on 08/24/2005 7:30:44 PM PDT by newzjunkey (Cindy Sheehan: "All You Are Saying Is Give APPEASEMENT A Chance!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: calif_reaganite; calcowgirl; SierraWasp; Grampa Dave; NormsRevenge
McClintock ping...
5 posted on 08/24/2005 7:34:58 PM PDT by tubebender (Growing old is mandatory...Growing up is optional)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calif_reaganite

Tom is making my next trip to the polls a no-brainer. Thanks Tom Arnold, I mean Tom and Arnold.


6 posted on 08/24/2005 7:40:41 PM PDT by HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath (Pray for America like its future depended on it, because it does!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calif_reaganite
NO. This measure locks in monopoly control of your electricity by the bureaucratized utilities and forbids you from ever being able to shop around for the lowest-priced electricity available.

Sorry Tom, but the last time I was promised a choice, I couldn't even by electricity at 18 cents a kw, while the City owned LA Light and power had a surplus to sell at 5 cents a kw.

7 posted on 08/24/2005 7:41:22 PM PDT by itsahoot (Any country that does not control its borders, is not a country. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tubebender
I agree enough with his picks to vote em at this point. I'm still waitin to vote on the ones that REALLY stop the borrowing/squandering AND that blows up the "non-elected boxes!" (unelected fatcat positions by appointment)

I would have been nicer and more supportive of his credibility had he gone ahead and done it, letting the sniveling bastards sue and let the state's attorney's grind the litigants down for all of us, like HE SAID HE WOULD!!!

8 posted on 08/24/2005 8:11:49 PM PDT by SierraWasp (Iraq! Our exit strategy should be... VICTORY!!! America IS to die for, Cindy Sheehan!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath
"Thanks Tom Arnold, I mean Tom and Arnold."

Well, I certainly see more difference in Tom, than I've ever seen between Tom Arnold and Arnold!!! That's for sure!!!

9 posted on 08/24/2005 8:14:33 PM PDT by SierraWasp (Iraq! Our exit strategy should be... VICTORY!!! America IS to die for, Cindy Sheehan!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ALOHA RONNIE; ambrose; Amerigomag; antceecee; atomic_dog; AVNevis; B4Ranch; backtothestreets; ...

McClintock Ping List.
Please freepmail me if you want on or off this list


10 posted on 08/24/2005 8:17:45 PM PDT by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calif_reaganite
I agree w/Tom on all his recos. Prop 75 is the key initiative the way I see it. If it passes, the Democrats will be stripped of their funding mechanism for years to come, unless of course they sue and some unelected judge voids it. Whenever we pass cool initiatives i.e. Prop 187 they always seem to find the right judge to overrule the voters. Powder Blue Report
11 posted on 08/24/2005 8:18:28 PM PDT by Allan Bartlett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Click here to help Fight Eminent Domain Abuse in California.

Let your elected officials in Sacramento know how you feel about SCA 15 and ACA 22.

12 posted on 08/24/2005 8:20:28 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... "To remain silent when they should protest makes cowards of men." -- THOMAS JEFFERSON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot
Sorry Tom, but the last time I was promised a choice, I couldn't even by electricity at 18 cents a kw, while the City owned LA Light and power had a surplus to sell at 5 cents a kw.

So that makes utility monopolies a GOOD idea?

As for the last time, if you are implying that we ever actually HAD deregulation in this state then you are dreaming. The power fiasco was caused by a bastardized set of new rules CALLED deregulation, which it was NOT.

13 posted on 08/24/2005 8:30:55 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (I'm sick and tired of being sick and tired!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
We are just going to have to disagree on this issue, I don't trust Enron types with something as necessary as Electricity, or highways either. I realize the Utility commission was corrupt to the bone, but they needed fixed.

I lived with Public Utilities since the 30's and never once ran short, except due to storms and the like.

14 posted on 08/24/2005 8:46:27 PM PDT by itsahoot (Any country that does not control its borders, is not a country. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

BTTT!!!!!!!


15 posted on 08/25/2005 3:05:36 AM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: calif_reaganite

I agree with Tom on these. Good calls...

Thanks for the post.


16 posted on 08/25/2005 6:48:20 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot
I don't trust Enron types with something as necessary as Electricity, or highways either.

I'll tell you what's even more necessary than electricity and highways -- food and clothing! I don't trust those corporate Enron types with those! We need to create one big huge farm monopoly and have them submit five-year plans. Same with the department stores. We need one big chain -- lets call it Gum. They can bring in the very best products at the fairest prices. If they come up short on inventory people can just line up.

17 posted on 08/25/2005 8:08:36 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan (I'm sick and tired of being sick and tired!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

What a superb reply!!! I nominate it for "Reply of the Month" on FR!!!


18 posted on 08/25/2005 8:31:08 AM PDT by SierraWasp (Iraq! Our exit strategy should be... VICTORY!!! America IS to die for, Cindy Sheehan!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: calif_reaganite

I was thinking today about how the FR anti-McClintock contingent has almost completely disappeared from the forum. I was reading an old recall thread and it seems as if all but 2 or 3 of the Tom haters have opused or vanished since the recall.


19 posted on 08/25/2005 10:04:53 AM PDT by jmc813 ("Small-government conservative" is a redundancy, and "compassionate conservative" is an oxymoron.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
Good information. Thanks.

I always look at McClintock's views before voting.

20 posted on 08/25/2005 12:57:05 PM PDT by Czar (StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson