Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Women turn to internet for truth about their date
Scotsman.com ^ | August 23, 2005 | Fiona MacGregor

Posted on 08/24/2005 8:09:41 AM PDT by billorites

ONE in three women prepare for blind dates by spying on their prospective partners via the internet to obtain information about their careers, their hobbies and what they look like, a new study has found.

Increasing numbers of men are also using internet search engines to carry out so-called "suitability checks" before meeting their date.

And private investigators have reported an increase in clients whose suspicions about their partners have been driven by "i-spying".

The study found about 35 per cent of women said they had no qualms about going even further and looking at messages on the mobile phone of a partner or date.

The UK poll of 3,000 people by Onetel, a broadband provider, found women were far more likely to admit to snooping than men, with just half the number of males confessing they had sneaked a look at their partners' text messages.

One in 20 people of both sexes said they had searched the internet for a photo of a future blind date - leading 4 per cent of them to cancel a meeting because they did not like what they saw.

While psychologists said that there is nothing wrong with checking out background information, they warned that those who meddled too deeply could end up losing partners through lack of trust.

Websites such as Friends Reunited were named as a fruitful source of information.

Over half of those questioned admitted they had checked the site to find out about partners.

Professional investigators said they were not surprised by the findings.

Stephen Grant, a partner at Grant and McMurtie with 25 years' experience as a private detective, said he had had an increase in clients coming to him whose suspicions had been fuelled by internet searches.

And he said he had dealt with more women than men in such cases. "I don't know if that is because men are more philandering or women are more suspicious," he said.

He added: "With internet searches, we get people in the early days of a relationship coming to us after they have found things out - perhaps that a person is married - and they want us to confirm that.

"For people in a relationship, it is often their mobile phones that give them away. Another area where people get caught out is e-mail.

"When a client comes to us we do an internet search and see what comes up - we may well find something in a newspaper article or court records."

While the report found over two-thirds of people believe women are more likely to snoop, it showed less distinction between male and female behaviour at the more extreme levels of suspicious behaviour.

Around 15 per cent of women and 12 per cent of men said they had sent a text to their partner from a different number pretending to be someone else to see if they took the bait.

And 17 per cent of women and 15 per cent of men would do a police check on their partner if they got the chance. It also found 28 per cent of women and 21 per cent of men frequently drive past the house of someone they are attracted to, to see if they are in and if any extra cars are on the drive.

Half the women said they read their partner's bank statement, compared to a third of men, and 40 per cent would inspect their partner's phone bill, compared to 24 per cent of men. And 16 per cent of people have unearthed a secret they really did not want to find out.

Dr Cynthia McVey, a psychologist at Glasgow Caledonian University, said: "[The stereotype of women snooping] may date back to a time when women were at home and had less opportunity to stray, while men were out at work. Wives who were suspicious would check receipts or for signs of lipstick or perfume.

"Internet snooping is just a modern version of ancient human responses to feelings of insecurity and jealousy.

"But while checking the internet for general information is fairly harmless, to read someone's text messages or e-mails is an invasion of privacy and shows a real lack of trust, which is not good in a relationship."

Perils and pros of doing some research when love comes a-clicking

EDWARD BLACK

WOMEN might think they are stealing a march on men by using the internet to uncover information on a prospective date, but they are not alone.

After meeting my current girlfriend in a nightclub, e-mail proved an embarrassment-free way of arranging that tricky first date as well as yielding her company details. A quick Google search dug up a photograph of her on a financial firm's website, and also a résumé of her career - invaluable for conversation purposes later.

Unfortunately, with me being a journalist, she was able to glean far more information about me as well as finding details of a romantic mini-break spent in a Scottish health spa with a former partner published in The Scotsman's travel section.

Fortunately she missed my name on a lapdancing industry website which appeared when I wrote a story on a sheriff who was forced to resign after being caught in a sauna.

Another potential internet banana skin was a feature which involved three former girlfriends dishing the dirt on what I was like to go out with. The so-called Ex-files were a response to a call from feminist Germaine Greer to set up a website for women to log details of men who had behaved badly towards them so that other women could avoid a similar fate.

Behaviour such as making a partner show you a text message when their phone bleeps in front of you shows an unattractive degree of paranoia. Teenage love letters should be private, so when it comes to saved text messages or e-mails, try something a bit more old-fashioned: trust.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: internet; singles
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-163 next last
To: KevinB
Well, I wound up marrying a 5'2", 100 lb, blond-haired, blue-eyed Norwegian beauty, so apparently she thinks my personality is okay.

I'm not mean but I didn't get one of of those. Where do I get one?

41 posted on 08/24/2005 10:10:19 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Islam is merely Nazism without the snappy fashion sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: baker_girl
I just recently signed up to an internet dating service. So far it's going pretty good. It's not as scary as I thought it would be.

I'm in my 40's but I want a girl in her late 20's to mid 30's so I can do the kid thing. S'okay or am I all wrong?

42 posted on 08/24/2005 10:12:21 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Islam is merely Nazism without the snappy fashion sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

That swab test is from Orchid Cellmark (the same Cellmark from the OJ Simpson trial).


I heard the ad too, and found it to be very strange/sad.


43 posted on 08/24/2005 10:14:15 AM PDT by Petronski (I stick to Rovian talking points: "I love Cyborg!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

I think it's great,we all have our own preferences. I'm in my early 20's and I want to meet a guy who is slightly older. Not Hugh Hefner old, but someone who is grounded and comforable with who they are.


44 posted on 08/24/2005 10:16:48 AM PDT by baker_girl (You are all winners,except those of you who lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
I'm in my 40's but I want a girl in her late 20's to mid 30's so I can do the kid thing.

If she wants to do "the kid thing" with you, and knows your age, and you're otherwise in love, what could be wrong?

I'd be weird, I think, if you were in your sixties and trying to do this (a la Tony Randall).

Then again, you didn't ask me. lol

45 posted on 08/24/2005 10:16:52 AM PDT by Petronski (I stick to Rovian talking points: "I love Cyborg!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog

I met my husband the old fashioned way - in a bar :)


46 posted on 08/24/2005 10:18:51 AM PDT by Gabz (USSG Warning: portable sewing machines are known to cause broken ankles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: baker_girl

Hmmm... How important is 'grounded'? Would a cad with a sharp sense of humor, but so far, not a lot of meanness, work for you? If it will, I'll have to find out how important "super skinny" is.


47 posted on 08/24/2005 10:19:32 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog (Join the Hobbit Hole Troop Support - http://freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
I dunno. I don't like an overweight woman myself. So is it horrible that I have my preferences?

************

Not at all, and I don't think that was what the poster (uh, can't remember the name) was referring to.

Much better for anyone to know what they like.

48 posted on 08/24/2005 10:20:10 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Gabz

I met some good people in bars... There's good and bad sorts in every room we walk into, internet, bar or otherwise. Our job is to sort them out correctly and try to be the good sort ourselves. :~D


49 posted on 08/24/2005 10:21:22 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog (Join the Hobbit Hole Troop Support - http://freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: billorites

I wish I spied on my ex.


50 posted on 08/24/2005 10:25:40 AM PDT by cyborg (I'm having the best day ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

I heard that commercial. I thought how sad society is that it's even needed.


51 posted on 08/24/2005 10:26:41 AM PDT by cyborg (I'm having the best day ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog

I'm hardly arrogant. I don't mind a heavier woman if she's honest. What throws me off is the dishonesty. If they lie right off...how honest will they be later.

I'm no prize. I'm a decent looking guy but am the first to admit I could lose 30 pounds myself.

But when I ran ads, I was HONEST about it.


52 posted on 08/24/2005 10:26:43 AM PDT by RockinRight (Democrats - Trying to make an a$$ out of America since 1933)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog

Well, I think I need to know what the definition is of "super skinny". Hopefully not the lollipop look! Otherwise I could deal with the sharp sense of humor:)


53 posted on 08/24/2005 10:27:02 AM PDT by baker_girl (You are all winners,except those of you who lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: baker_girl
I think it's great,we all have our own preferences. I'm in my early 20's and I want to meet a guy who is slightly older. Not Hugh Hefner old, but someone who is grounded and comforable with who they are.

Heh. You a cutie? ;^)

54 posted on 08/24/2005 10:28:19 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Islam is merely Nazism without the snappy fashion sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

Not it matters now but when I posted profiles on the net, I told the truth. I posted a nice pic of myself with all my stats. I maybe got two resposes and that was it. There are a lot of guys that like to be lied to.


55 posted on 08/24/2005 10:28:43 AM PDT by cyborg (I'm having the best day ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog

I wasn't trying to be mean spirited. As I said I am NOT really that picky on looks. It was the dishonesty that bothered me.

The "Michael Moore" comparison was in poor taste. I am sorry if that came across as mean, I was being dramatic to make a point.


56 posted on 08/24/2005 10:29:07 AM PDT by RockinRight (Democrats - Trying to make an a$$ out of America since 1933)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

Fair enough.... I know there's plenty of liars out there.... of both sexes. I was plenty nervous sharing descriptions of myself and photos when I was first getting to know my husband, but I wouldn't have lied. We were set to meet up soon, and I can't photoshop the truth in person.


57 posted on 08/24/2005 10:29:27 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog (Join the Hobbit Hole Troop Support - http://freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: baker_girl

Watch out for married men, esp. with the sites like match.com and yahoo.


58 posted on 08/24/2005 10:29:53 AM PDT by cyborg (I'm having the best day ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: baker_girl
A friend of mine met a guy she's been with for 3 or 4 years now at match.com. A former gay colleague of mine met many men through the man-man section. Others I know of have had no luck.

Luckily, I am happily involved with someone. Best of luck to you. Online is just like real life - you might go through a lot to get a good one.

59 posted on 08/24/2005 10:29:53 AM PDT by technochick99 (firearm of choice: Sig Sauer....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: baker_girl

Well, the guy I'm thinking of is really big on "Cad"... that would have to be OK with you ;~D


60 posted on 08/24/2005 10:30:25 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog (Join the Hobbit Hole Troop Support - http://freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-163 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson