Another small step to Big Brother society.
1 posted on
08/23/2005 10:28:47 PM PDT by
buzzyboop
To: buzzyboop
2 posted on
08/23/2005 10:32:26 PM PDT by
agitator
(...And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark)
To: buzzyboop
Isn't this against the law? When E911 was introduced to Indiana, it was strictly forbidden to use this service for tracking of anyone other than a victim in need of emergency care. If I remember correctly, it couldn't even be used to track down criminals unless there was someone involved in a kidnap/hostage situation.
How does this come anywhere close to legal?
3 posted on
08/23/2005 10:39:48 PM PDT by
GovGirl
(Newsweek lied, people died...can we make that into a t-shirt?)
To: buzzyboop
A spokeswoman at Verizon Wireless wondered whether it could lead to innocent subscribers having their numbers and addresses released to a government agency. And you can bet if there is .. those people will sue the pants off of Verizon
5 posted on
08/23/2005 10:41:07 PM PDT by
Mo1
(Hey Cindy ... tell us again why Our Country is not worth fighting for)
To: buzzyboop
15 posted on
08/24/2005 9:52:56 AM PDT by
timestax
To: buzzyboop
I imagine most people that don't want to be found will simply switch to one of those pre-paid anonymous tracphones you can buy in just about every convenience store
16 posted on
08/24/2005 9:57:48 AM PDT by
apillar
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson