Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Doc Savage

So, If the jet exploded on it's own, why were 747s allowed to continue flying after this?

Did Boeing agree with the findings?




48 posted on 08/19/2005 7:03:53 AM PDT by rdax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: rdax
So, If the jet exploded on it's own, why were 747s allowed to continue flying after this?

-------------------------------

Ask the same question about the Airbus after the flight to the DR exploded over Queens on take off in late 2001.

50 posted on 08/19/2005 7:08:02 AM PDT by wtc911 (see my profile for how to contribute to a pentagon heroes fund)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: rdax
If the jet exploded on it's own, why were 747s allowed to continue flying after this?

Changes were made to operating procedures to address the "found" (or fabricated) cause of ignition. I don't recall exactly what the changes were, but may have been to never have an empty center fuel tank.

76 posted on 08/19/2005 8:50:20 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: rdax

"Did Boeing agree with the findings? "

IIRC, Boeing got a large contract shortly thereafter.


124 posted on 08/19/2005 9:26:33 PM PDT by Tymesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson