Posted on 08/13/2005 3:58:26 PM PDT by Dan from Michigan
Highway Robbery: $286 Billion
by John Berthoud
Posted Aug 12, 2005
George Orwell’s 1946 classic Animal Farm is a tale of the rising up of the long downtrodden animals to overthrow the hated humans and establish a new order. Under new management, the farm seems to move in the right direction for a while, but the pigs slowly decide that the lifestyle of their former masters was pretty good, and consequently morph into a ruling class indistinguishable from that which they displaced. Originally intended by Orwell to parody the Soviet revolution of 1917, one can now see parallels to the Republican Revolution of 1994. There is no better example of the new management’s taking on the manner of the old regime than the highway bill that President Bush signed this week.
This bill combines spending excess, poor allocation of public dollars, gross political self-interest and fudged numbers to boot. All of these ingredients are smothered in oily rhetoric about “creating jobs.”
Record Spending
The official cost of the new highway bill is $286.4 billion, which is a record. But maybe the most shocking aspect is the pork. Nearly 6,500 pork-barrel projects are stuffed into the bill. In 1987, President Ronald Reagan vetoed that year’s highway bill because he (rightly) objected to the inclusion of a “mere” 152 member-requested projects for their districts. That politics trumped good public policy in this year’s bill can be seen maybe most clearly in Alaska, where Republican porkers—Sen. Ted Stevens and Rep. Don Young—managed to secure the fourth highest number of earmarks for the third least populous state.
Paralleling the legerdemain of the 2003 Medicare prescription drug bill, Republicans even threw in phony numbers to try to pretend the bill doesn’t dramatically exceed the spending limit that had been set—with a veto threat—by Bush. The bill contains a promise that on the very last day the measure is in effect—Sept. 30, 2009—Congress will make an unspecified spending cut of $8.5 billion. Long years of experience have shown time and again that when a sitting Congress promises unspecified spending cuts by a future Congress, it is meaningless rhetoric.
All told, the bill exceeds by $11 billion the spending level that Bush promised would elicit his first veto. Fiscal conservatives must continue to wait for that veto, as the administration has again capitulated to the big spenders on Capitol Hill.
The Republican base is told to be happy about this mess. After all, the legislation will—in the words of House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R.-Ill.)—“create jobs,” and is, according to Bush, “fiscally responsible.” Scroll back to the late 1970s and imagine how Republicans then would have responded to such claims by Democratic Speaker Tip O’Neill (Mass.) and Democratic President Jimmy Carter about a similar pork-filled spending bill.
The highway bill is not an isolated incident. Federal spending is up sharply in almost all categories. The President’s own budget office is estimating that federal spending this year will be 33% higher than just four years ago. This is hardly just the result of Defense and Homeland Security expenditures. Consider that over these same four years, spending at the Department of Agriculture will have skyrocketed 40%, while spending at the Department of Education will have grown at almost twice the rate of military spending.
As a consequence of this spending splurge, the tax cut train has stalled, and in fact, it is quite likely that many of the tax cuts enacted during the first Bush term will fall by the wayside. (When tax rates are higher tomorrow than today, we fiscal conservatives call that a “tax hike.”) If taxes start to rise under GOP rule, the unraveling of the Republican Revolution will be complete and—just as with Orwell’s pigs—the new rulers will be completely indistinguishable from the pre-1994 manor lords.
"A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largess from the public treasury. From that time on the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury, with the results that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship. The average age of the world's great civilizations has been 200 years. These nations have progressed through this sequence: from bondage to spiritual faith from spiritual faith to great courage from courage to liberty from liberty to abundance from abundance to selfishness from selfishness to complacency from complacency to apathy from apathy to dependency from dependency back to bondage. -- Alexander Fraser Tytler (1742-1813)
But not surprising.
Even some of the Republican Senators are starting to notice how much spending has gone up in the past six years
And yet, it will be completely accepted.
The fact that the Republicans could not even find the stones to eliminate PBS outright speaks volumes.
If they cannot even eliminate that government program -- the continuation of which cannot be supported by even a single le valid reason -- then they cannot reduce the Progressive state even one iota.
Yep, just sitting there watching.
July budget deficit narrows to $52.79 billion Posted by Smogger On News/Activism 08/10/2005 1:30:00 PM PDT · 23 replies ·
BULLETIN >> U.S. FEDERAL DEFICIT SHRINKS TO $53 BLN IN JULY Posted by SierraWasp On News/Activism 08/10/2005 11:15:11 AM PDT · 318 replies ·
Economy shows some verve (largest dip in the trade deficit since 1947) Posted by xzins On News/Activism 08/01/2005 9:19:11 AM PDT · 23 replies ·
What Makes Up the Trade Deficit? Posted by Willie Green On News/Activism 07/29/2005 12:02:14 PM PDT · 38 replies · 506+ views
Rosen: Good news on the deficit (Econ 101 Reagan, GWB policies vindicated) Posted by A.A. Cunningham On News/Activism 07/22/2005 7:34:04 AM PDT · 27 replies ·
America's Truth Deficit Posted by Willie Green On News/Activism 07/19/2005 10:52:08 AM PDT · 49 replies · 9
Michael Barone: Bush well on way to meeting deficit promise Posted by RWR8189 On News/Activism 07/17/2005 12:23:07 PM PDT · 58 replies ·
Bush Credits Policies for Falling Deficit Posted by Tumbleweed_Connection On News/Activism 07/16/2005 12:37:25 PM PDT · 27 replies ·
The deficit is shrinking, thanks to the Bush tax cuts. Posted by freedrudge On News/Activism 07/15/2005 6:12:48 AM PDT · 88 replies ·
Hold the gloom: Bush scores 1-2-3 punch on terrorism, education and the deficit within 48 hours Posted by quesney On News/Activism 07/14/2005 6:47:56 PM PDT · 6 replies · 457+ views
White House hails lower estimate for deficit Posted by Cincinatus' Wife On News/Activism 07/14/2005 12:54:44 AM PDT · 8 replies ·
Deficit nearly $100 billion below earlier estimates (Bush tax cuts works) Posted by freedrudge On News/Activism 07/13/2005 2:03:40 PM PDT · 17 replies · 537+ views
More Good Economic News, Deficit Falling Dramatically Posted by Wrangler22 On Bloggers & Personal 07/13/2005 9:30:05 AM PDT · 2 replies · 72+ views
White House: Deficit Plummeting to $333B Posted by Syco On News/Activism 07/13/2005 8:44:29 AM PDT · 79 replies ·
Sharp Increase in Tax Revenue to Pare Deficit Posted by Tumbleweed_Connection On News/Activism 07/12/2005 7:30:01 PM PDT · 11 replies · 380+ views
U.S. Budget Deficit Narrowing Quickly On Revenue Surge Posted by QQQQQ On News/Activism 07/12/2005 12:34:03 PM PDT · 137 replies · 1,819+ views
Disappearing Deficit [should be gone] Posted by Brilliant On News/Activism 07/12/2005 5:21:15 AM PDT · 15 replies · 962+ views
"Higher tax receipts cut deficit, analysts say" (Tax Cuts Working!) Posted by Names Ash Housewares On News/Activism 07/08/2005 4:19:20 PM PDT · 65 replies · 811+ views
U.S. Budget Deficit Tumbles, Congressional Analysts Say Posted by Skylab On News/Activism 07/07/2005 3:41:41 PM PDT · 68 replies ·
CBO: Deficit thru 3 quarters $251B vs. $327B year ago Posted by SierraWasp On News/Activism 07/07/2005 2:54:27 PM PDT · 43 replies · 627+ views
Click to show more articles ...
And your alternative is?
As an incentive, give the congresscritters 10% of the spending reduction y/y. In no time we will see reduced spending!
When their asses are on the line in 2006, they'll bring up the Rat bogeyman, hoping that the battered-wife conservatives will take back the abusive GOP that was out drinking for the night and sleeping around.
I have advocated this idea for years.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.