Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Do Try This at Home: Assess Your Area's Real Estate Bubble
New York Times ^ | August 13, 2005 | DAMON DARLIN

Posted on 08/13/2005 2:01:17 PM PDT by nickcarraway

For the first time since the residential real estate marathon began 13 years ago, parts of the country are showing signs of exhaustion. But if you rely on the experts to declare that a particular area's bubble has popped, you may have waited too long.

So how can a homeowner tell if a market is about to go bust? This may be one of those rare occasions when professionals parsing data are at a disadvantage to regular people watching the market. That's because the main driver of today's market is consumer psychology. Home prices go up as long as people expect them to go up.

When they stop believing, prices fall - and no economist in Washington can get wind of that faster than someone chatting over knockwurst at a neighborhood block party. "Economists looking at the macrodata will be the last to know," said Richard A. Brown, chief economist at the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

What you will learn from the professionals who are dutifully crunching numbers is that prices are not falling significantly in any of the hot markets, but in a dozen or so cities in the Northeast and in California, they are near the peak. In Boston, for example, the time that homes are sitting on the market has stretched to 46 days from 39 days a year ago.

An analysis of price appreciation, done for The New York Times by the Joint Center for Housing Studies at Harvard, shows that the price appreciation in cities including New York City; Austin, Tex.; Philadelphia; and Providence, R.I., are decelerating. Appreciation in Detroit and Denver has already slowed to a crawl.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; US: California; US: New York
KEYWORDS: bigolbubble; bubble; economy; housing; interestrates; realestate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 08/13/2005 2:01:18 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

""Austin, Tex""


Home prices there peaked in 2001 and have been falling ever since (ditto DFW). The reporter should get off his A@@ and do some actualy investigatation before writing a story.


2 posted on 08/13/2005 2:03:18 PM PDT by atlanta67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Yes, all Freepers should depend on the NY Slimes for news, financial advise and when any bubble is breaking.


3 posted on 08/13/2005 2:04:21 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (The civilized world must win WW IV/the Final Crusade and destroy Jihadism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atlanta67
Home prices there peaked in 2001 and have been falling ever since (ditto DFW)

I find that hard to believe.

4 posted on 08/13/2005 2:08:09 PM PDT by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: atlanta67

I don't think they "peaked" in 2001 in DFW. I think they may only be now starting to level off. Lots of building here. Whole neighborhoods being "gentrified" and lots of restoration of old "classic" houses.


5 posted on 08/13/2005 2:13:52 PM PDT by garyhope (Islamofascism wants the death of Western civilization. Simple as that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: garyhope

I did see where Dallas home prices have been stable or falling ever since 2001. Ditto Denver though Ive read DEN's home prices hade been rising recently

Dont forget DFW's economy was hard hit by both 9-11 and Telecom bubble implosion. In 2002 DFW area had over 8% unemployment


Also just because there is home building doesnt mean prices are rising.


6 posted on 08/13/2005 2:15:36 PM PDT by atlanta67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
The time on market is longer around here (Northern VA) because lots of overpriced junk is pouring onto the market. There are crack condos selling for $395k and 7 bedroom monsters on 0.23 acres for $1.25 million. Nobody wants junk like that so it sits on the market and drives up the average. Likewise everyone with the flexibility to do so is selling their place, nice or not and expecting the bidding wars that were occurring last spring even though they have priced their places 10 or 20% higher. A lot of these are being sold by realtors who have a whopping 3 months experience in a bubble market so you can expect a lot of mistakes.

It is still clearly a seller's market for properly priced, desirable properties. The bubble has not popped, but the prices have stopped for now, no telling what they will do this fall or next spring.

7 posted on 08/13/2005 2:19:21 PM PDT by palmer (If you see flies at the entrance to the burrow, the ground hog is probably inside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atlanta67

Impossible. Interest rates are at least a point lower than they were in 2001, which drives prices up even in static markets.


8 posted on 08/13/2005 2:25:00 PM PDT by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HostileTerritory

that isnt true..interest rates were falling from 1990 through 1994, and yet California's home prices fell each and every year.


9 posted on 08/13/2005 2:26:04 PM PDT by atlanta67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

You'll know when your local market slows if you pay attention. You'll hear it at school, at church, at work..
(But you knew that - 'didn't need me chiming in.).

And Realtors don't try to keep all the information listed in the article secret. Just call one, tell them you are thinking of selling and ask them to get some comparables, and stop by some evening and give you their opinion.

They will show you every house that sold in your neighborhood, how long it was on the market, and the selling price.

It ain't no secret. (But you knew that.)

Everybody kept predicting the bubble would burst because they wanted to be the expert who was first to know and tell.

The baby boomers ARE getting older, and ARE having an impact on the market. They have gotten most of their kids through college, paid for a wedding or two, and now they want a home on the lake, on the beach or in the mountains.
That plus low interest rates has driven this market.

If and when there is a recession, there will be retrenchment in real estate. But in the long term, there is nothing better...not even gold. (And as your grandfather told you, "They're not making any more!)


10 posted on 08/13/2005 2:26:37 PM PDT by Rhetorical pi2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atlanta67

The trend nationwide and statewide in 1990 through 1994 was down. That hasn't been the case from 2001 through 2004. Also, they've gotten ever more creative with financing, allowing lenders to stretch further.


11 posted on 08/13/2005 2:27:48 PM PDT by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Appreciation in Detroit and Denver has already slowed to a crawl.

That's pretty funny; I'm surprised houses in Detroit can sell for anything at all - I wouldn't move there at gunpoint.

12 posted on 08/13/2005 2:28:06 PM PDT by Hank Rearden (Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hank Rearden
I wouldn't move there at gunpoint.

That's how things generally happen in Detroit.

13 posted on 08/13/2005 2:29:18 PM PDT by nickcarraway (I'm Only Alive, Because a Judge Hasn't Ruled I Should Die...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy

The only place real estate prices may have peaked in 2001 and have fallen since.....Love Canal, New York.


14 posted on 08/13/2005 2:29:36 PM PDT by DCPatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HostileTerritory

but your statement was home prices can never fall (impossible you said) when interest rates are falling or at least low. Well i gave an example where they did.

Austin and Dallas have had steady or slightly falling home prices since their peak in 2001.

I know it is unpopular to say here on FR that there isnt a housing bubble nationwide, but the fact is much of the country has seen home price appreciation in the mid single digits such as Atlanta. Other markets like Denver experienced falling home prices from 2001-2003 or so. Some like St Louis and Cincinatti are stagnant with only very low housing appreciation.


15 posted on 08/13/2005 2:32:10 PM PDT by atlanta67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: atlanta67

Check out the data for Austin:

http://recenter.tamu.edu/data/hs/hs140b.htm

Prices in 2002 were considerably higher than 2001, and have been steady or risingly slightly since then once you account for seasonal fluctuations. The volume of sales is up significantly since 2002.


16 posted on 08/13/2005 2:40:25 PM PDT by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: atlanta67

Prices in Dallas are well above where they were in 2001.

http://recenter.tamu.edu/data/hs/hs200b.htm


17 posted on 08/13/2005 2:41:30 PM PDT by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: HostileTerritory

there isnt much stability in this chart. Prices are all over the place since late 2001


18 posted on 08/13/2005 2:42:24 PM PDT by atlanta67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: HostileTerritory

looks like only in the last couple of months have home prices been rising consistently in dallas.


I know your point is that there is a nation wide bubble, but there isnt


19 posted on 08/13/2005 2:44:01 PM PDT by atlanta67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: atlanta67
looks like only in the last couple of months have home prices been rising consistently in dallas.

June is the peak of sales. June 2005 was significantly higher than June 2004 was significantly higher than June 2003.

I know your point is that there is a nation wide bubble, but there isnt

I don't believe there is a nationwide bubble in real estate. I think that the bubble in some markets has spread further than people expected, and that the effects of creative financing and real estate mania have affected markets where a bubble isn't visible.
20 posted on 08/13/2005 2:48:37 PM PDT by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson