Posted on 08/12/2005 8:47:04 AM PDT by InvisibleChurch
UP IN SMOKE
Daily Policy Digest
LEGAL ISSUES
Friday, August 12, 2005
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last week, the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) filed suit challenging the 1998 tobacco settlement on constitutional grounds. The CEI believes the deal, reached between a bloc of 46 states and the country's largest tobacco companies, violates the Compact Clause found in Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution: "No State shall, without the Consent of Congress . . . enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State."
According to Investor's Business Daily (IBD) the $246 billion tobacco settlement was supposed to be used to treat tobacco-related illnesses and for antismoking education. Instead, many states have spent the money on other things:
Five states plus the District of Columbia have yet to commit their first dollar of the settlement to prevention, and another 15 have spent the minimum. Since the program began, only 3 percent of settlement funds have been spent on prevention. States have done better when it comes to health-related spending, accounting for about 33 percent of the funds spent this year. But they're still shortchanging those they said they'd help, and last year spent a mere 19.8 percent. Where's the money going?
Nearly half (44 percent) of last year's payment was used to offset budget shortfalls, and more than a third (36 percent) was used for the same purpose the year before. When Gray Davis was governor, California sold $2.4 billion of its share to balance the budget; but the Golden State has hardly been alone in turning future income from the deal into immediate cash -- at a large loss. For their part, tobacco companies have had to raise prices to pay for the sham settlement. No big deal, say nonsmokers. But wait: Once the lawyers and politicians who fleeced Big Tobacco target another industry, it'll be more than just smokers who'll get burned, says IBD.
Source: Editorial, "Up In Smoke," Investor's Business Daily, August 12, 2005.
For text (subscription required):
http://www.investors.com/editorial/IBDArticles.asp?artsec=20&artnum=2
For more on Tobacco Company Suits:
http://www.ncpa.org/iss/leg/
Rush was right...again.
Let me get this straight. This money was extracted from the tobacco companies because they lied about the health effects of tobacco, and the states promised it would go for treatment and prevention of the use of tobacco, but now it turns out that the states have lied as well...so who gets the money now? (rhetorical question)
Cash Cow. Is it right to buy cigarettes from terrorists to say FU to the PC stalinists?
Sure baby, we'll respect you in the morning.
Bwaaaahaaahaaahaa!
On the news yesterday we were treated to the "Jennings effect" which is people who saw how fast cancer killed Jennings are going to quit. Oh poop oh dear. What are the states going to do without their cash cow?
Didn't the lawyers get a huge chunk of this settlement?
I should mention that this very week, my father was diagnosed with stage IV large cell carcinoma of the lungs. He quit smoking 25 years ago after having been a two-pack-a-day smoker for about 25 years. (The risk for lung cancer diminishes after quitting smoking but unfortunately not all the way to zero: some of the damage to the lungs is permanent. Many lung cancers occur in former smokers.) His prognosis is daunting: he has a 40% chance of responding to chemotherapy.
I've learned a lot about lung cancer this last week. Lung cancer is not the most common cancer, but it is by a wide margin the leading cause of death by cancer. There are about 165,000 lung cancer cases per year in the US, and there are about 150,000 deaths caused by this malignancy per year (28 percent of all cancer deaths). Here's the key statistic: 1 in 10 smokers or former smokers get this disease; their risk is 15 - 20 times greater than non-smokers. 85% of lung cancers are fatal within 5 years.
Does this surprise anybody?
Someone should have a closer look at how Skip Humphrey lassoed the tobacco settlement money (and a lifetime job for himself and his leftist clones) in Minnesota.
Never fear. Cheeseburger and Cookie tariffs are near.
You got that right. However there may be some backlash from us poor dupes that can't see for ourselves how we are killing ourselves. I'm going to enjoy a hamburger for lunch today as a matter of fact
I've never been able to figure out why Philip Morris runs anti-ciggarette ads. Does it actually help them?
"my father was diagnosed with stage IV large cell carcinoma of the lungs. He quit smoking 25 years ago after having been a two-pack-a-day smoker for about 25 years."
This may be news to you, but everyone dies sooner or later. How old is your father?
It was always about the cash.
I'm not certain, but I think it is part of the settlement that they run ads to get rid of their customers. Crazy world, ain't it?
I told everyone then, that eventually, people would be suing McDonald's and other fast food establishments for health related problems due to individual irresponsibility...just like that of smoking.
When you been around 'animals' long enough, the smell of manure is always easy to detect.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.